Isolated/Closed Systems: Relativistic Thermodynamics Explained

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
893
Reaction score
483
If you put everything in a rest frame, it seems as if it's impossible to tell an isolated system from a closed system (globally in SR, locally in GR). Am I off my rocker to think so?

There's at least one catch I've thought of so far: light. I can't say for sure that it satisfies either definition because it can't be dragged into a rest frame, but I also can't say it shouldn't be thought of as a closed or isolated system. It's counterintuitive in a 3space+1time worldview, because EM radiation behaves almost like a dissipative transport process as seen in Poynting's Theorem (flow of charges through an E field gives you a work that is distributed in an irreversible fashion as radiation). But could a 4-volume element full of EM radiation be called an isolated/closed system? If so, is the specific internal energy of that volume element defined? Or am I just completely off my rocker?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Twigg said:
If you put everything in a rest frame, it seems as if it's impossible to tell an isolated system from a closed system

What are your definitions of "isolated" and "closed"?
 
Sorry for the late reply.

PeterDonis said:
What are your definitions of "isolated" and "closed"?

You hit the nail on the head, thanks. I was defining them both to be systems with no flow of invariant mass/energy in or out, so my question was a silly one. My bad.