Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

[SteveElbows]

This is going to make SteveElbows even sadder (sorry, Steve!), but I think I see puffs of steam in that video, near the end.

I don't mind steam etc from the early weeks of the disaster, it was the search for new horror months after the disaster that annoyed me, as if the disaster wasn't bad enough for some. Anyway this forum was mostly a good shelter from the worst of that stuff, my moans would be better directed elsewhere really, and Id be lying if I said I didn't enjoy debunking silly stuff.

Sadly the resolution & compression of that video make it very hard for me to glean much of interest, and there are plenty of non-nuclear things on site that could have steamed or smoked at that moment I guess.

 

[shadowncs]

(btw, the video of the ride. Unit 2 http://tepco.webcdn.stream.ne.jp/www11/tepco/download/120315_01j.zip and unit 3 http://tepco.webcdn.stream.ne.jp/www11/tepco/download/120315_02j.zip )

Looking at the vid from unit 3 - at about 4:30 there is the door (pic1, pic2), definitely bent outwards like from an inner containment blast. Also following the attempts to open the door (kicking at it) there is this pipe that apparently has its cap blown off (pic3) - they even stick the geiger down the pipe. Also the big-*** stainless steel vertical pipe has the floor cap blown upwards (pic4), like from an underfloor blast.

Also towards the end of vid there is sign of shrapnel dents on a SS pipe.

May thanks for posting these vids - to me they prove the explosion was from inside containment not from upper floor. Probably the most revealing thing on unit3 in the last 3/4 year.

Edit: those workers must have balls of steel, kudos to them!

 

[shadowncs]

And pic4 (sorry for doublepost)

 

[MadderDoc]

<..> I see puffs of steam in that video, near the end.

Indeed. The puffs appear from behind the corner of unit 2, while they do block the view to unit 1, i.e. the puffing would seem to be in the vicinity of the space between those two units.
We could be looking at visual evidence of the initial operations of the unit 1 Isolation Condenser.

 

[clancy688]

How thick is the door in question?

If it's an entry into the containment then it ought to be a massive, reinforced steel door. Is there anything else besides an explosion which could deform such a door?

A question to the physicists here: How would a steel door react if it's suffering massive heat on one side, but not on the other? Would it really bend outwards, away from the heat?
Perhaps I'm telling total bogus now, but if there'd be any thermal deformation, I'd expect the door to bend exactly the other way - inwards.

 

[zapperzero]

How thick is the door in question?

If it's an entry into the containment then it ought to be a massive, reinforced steel door. Is there anything else besides an explosion which could deform such a door?

A question to the physicists here: How would a steel door react if it's suffering massive heat on one side, but not on the other? Would it really bend outwards, away from the heat?
Perhaps I'm telling total bogus now, but if there'd be any thermal deformation, I'd expect the door to bend exactly the other way - inwards.

It doesn't matter which way it would bend. You'd have scorch marks at the very least - in fact, you'd have no paint left on that door at all, if you put in enough heat to warp it permanently. Not much door either, I believe :)

 

[shadowncs]

How thick is the door in question?

Judging from unit 2 video the door is not as thick as one might guess. Certainly it has a knob and can easily be opened (and more importantly closed) by hand. As I understand it this is not a door into containment, it's just a door to the torus room. While torus is part of containment the room in which it resides might not qualify as containment (ie if torus breaks then containment is breached). If that is the case then to get that pressure differential to bend the door (even if the door is not that thick) means a break either in torus or in one of the massive pipes that leads to drywell AND a pressure spike in the drywell.

Now normally the drywell has no oxygen (N2 atmosphere). However the explosion happened 3 days (if I remember) after power was lost which means there is ample time for some percentage of oxygen to seep in and react with the H2 from Zr-steam after venting. Another alternative that I see is a superheated bundle of metal falling all at once into a pool of water - no idea if the core (or a big chunk of) can possibly drop all at once to the bottom of RPV into water causing a steam explosion.

Not to beat a dead horse but I'd personally go with H2 explosion in drywell.

 

[clancy688]

Not to beat a dead horse but I'd personally go with H2 explosion in drywell.

Um, it's not the first time I've posted the following document here (though jlduh provided it first), but it was mostly ignored. So, here again:

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/5835351-nR29Hq/5835351.pdf

"The impact of BWR MK I primary containment failure dynamics on secondary containment integrity."

A second potential mechanism for MK I primary containment failure
in an unmitigated severe accident is drywell liner (shell) ablation due
to direct attack by molten corium. The ability of molten metals to
erode steel structures is well documented.4 While significant uncertainties
surround the behavior of core/concrete reactions and corium
spreading in a MK I containment configuration,2 preliminary analyses
indicate failure of the MK I drywell liner is quite likely if core
debris does contact the inner liner surface5.
Should the liner fail near the drywell floor elevation, the most
probable sites for blowdown entry into the secondary containment are the
reactor building basement torus room and the second floor of the reactor
building (Exhibit 2).

We probably do have some corium outside the pressure vessel, at least that's what TEPCO thinks, and this paper proclaims that under certain circumstances (corium attacks the drywell liner) a blowdown in the torus room is very likely.On a second note:
If there actually is a hole connecting the primary containment with the torus room (either through drywell liner failure as explained above or torus damage), shouldn't the torus room be filled with water?
As far as I understand, TEPCO kept pouring water into the reactor vessels and containments until the drywell was filled to a certain height, so if there is a leak to the torus room, it should be filled with water as well.

Edit: Oh, tsutsuji already answered that question:

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-fukushima/20120314/index.html On 14 March, a total of 6 Tepco workers went down to the basements and inspected the vicinity of the entrances of unit 2 and unit 3's suppression chambers. [...] It was confirmed that the 9 meter high suppression chambers in both units are partly submerged by 6 meter deep contaminated water.

Which spikes new questions for me:

First, where does the water come from? If shadowncs is correct and those chambers are secondary and not primary containment, then there have to be some containment breaches in either the torus itself or the drywell. Where else would the water come from otherwise?

And second, why are they only filled partially and not totally? If there are leaks and if there's water in the drywell (to cool escaped fuel) then I'd expect the lower lying chambers to be totally submerged and not only partially. Why aren't they?

 

[shadowncs]

On a second note:
If there actually is a hole connecting the primary containment with the torus room (either through drywell liner failure as explained above or torus damage), shouldn't the torus room be filled with water?
As far as I understand, TEPCO kept pouring water into the reactor vessels and containments until the drywell was filled to a certain height, so if there is a leak to the torus room, it should be filled with water as well.

And perhaps it is? In the vids you can clearly see both unit 2 and unit 3 lower-level basements are flooded at the stairwell. For unit3 vid the worker spends a large amount of time measuring radioactivity of the stairwell water, outside the torus room, which appears to be a few meters lower than the basement level the torus room door is located. That water comes from somewhere perhaps the most likely being the torus room. Remember those rooms are quite high. As to water in drywell, TEPCO is yet to confirm there is any water at all - see unit 2 endoscope. We simply don't know yet but I tend to agree, if the torus were intact then we'd expect water in drywell.

I'm surprised by the fact the unit 2 door could be opened, that with the "explosive sounds" reported coming from unit 2 torus early on.

 

[SteveElbows]

Um, it's not the first time I've posted the following document here (though jlduh provided it first), but it was mostly ignored. So, here again:

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/5835351-nR29Hq/5835351.pdf

"The impact of BWR MK I primary containment failure dynamics on secondary containment integrity."

Don't worry you are not alone, I go on about blowdown to the torus room from time to time, especially now that we've had a glimpse into the torus rooms so it is fresh in peoples minds. Cant take it much further though until we have more useful evidence or data, which could be a long wait.

On a second note:
If there actually is a hole connecting the primary containment with the torus room (either through drywell liner failure as explained above or torus damage), shouldn't the torus room be filled with water?
As far as I understand, TEPCO kept pouring water into the reactor vessels and containments until the drywell was filled to a certain height, so if there is a leak to the torus room, it should be filled with water as well.

TEPCOs original stabilisation plan involved filling the drywells up with water to a certain height, but they realized it wasn't working, and all that contaminated water was then found in the basements. Also when they did the endoscope camera thing at reactor 2 the water level in the drywell was lower than their more recent assumptions, so they are still playing catchup with reality. The next endoscope will be longer and they hope to get a visual on the water, though frankly I wouldn't be shocked if it turns out there is hardly any water staying in the drywell at all. We don't have too long to wait till this next mission, I am sure its supposed to happen in March.

First, where does the water come from? If shadowncs is correct and those chambers are secondary and not primary containment, then there have to be some containment breaches in either the torus itself or the drywell. Where else would the water come from otherwise?

And second, why are they only filled partially and not totally? If there are leaks and if there's water in the drywell (to cool escaped fuel) then I'd expect the lower lying chambers to be totally submerged and not only partially. Why aren't they?

Im sure the torus rooms don't count as primary containment. And they have not been able to deny some kind of containment breach ever since they found so much water at the lower levels.

The lower levels are not completely submerged for several reasons. Firstly there is also lots of water in the basement of the turbine buildings, which may be flowing from the reactor building, so there is lots of room for the water to take up. And secondly they have been pumping water out of the turbine buildings to be processed by the water treatment systems. This ties into the leaks into the sea via trenches etc, and their desperate race against time to keep the water level to a certain limit. The water level fluctuates but ue to the pumping it doesn't get high enough to fill the entire torus room.

But I also think its quite likely that they may be relying on the water in the basements to provide shielding against anything nasty that may have fallen down there, and cooling of such corium, so even if they have the capacity to pump almost all of the water out of the torus rooms, turbine basements etc, I don't know as they would want to at this stage.

 

[SteveElbows]

And perhaps it is? In the vids you can clearly see both unit 2 and unit 3 lower-level basements are flooded at the stairwell. For unit3 vid the worker spends a large amount of time measuring radioactivity of the stairwell water, outside the torus room, which appears to be a few meters lower than the basement level the torus room door is located. That water comes from somewhere perhaps the most likely being the torus room. Remember those rooms are quite high. As to water in drywell, TEPCO is yet to confirm there is any water at all - see unit 2 endoscope. We simply don't know yet but I tend to agree, if the torus were intact then we'd expect water in drywell.

I'm surprised by the fact the unit 2 door could be opened, that with the "explosive sounds" reported coming from unit 2 torus early on.

Yes I am pretty sure that the water in the stairwell is the same as torus room water, because those stairs lead down to the floor level of the torus room (as opposed to the door they opened to look into the torus room, which is at least half-way up the torus room wall).

If neither the torus or the lower part of the drywell had damage then yes, we would expect to see much more water in the drywell, TEPCOs original drywell flooding plan would not have been abandoned. We can't use this to establish with certainty that the torus is damaged though because if the torus was intact but the bottom or lower walls of the drywell were damaged, we could still expect to see little water in the drywell and lots of water in the torus room.

As for the explosion at reactor 2, this has not been a safe assumption for a long time either. Firstly because the explosion at reactor 4 building happened around the same time, causing confusion, and later when they looked at local plant seismograph readings it looked like reactor 4 was the epicentre, not reactor 2. And the other reason they made a hasty assumption that the reactor 2 suppression chamber went boom, was because for many hours before the explosion they were afraid that the reactor 2 suppression chamber was in trouble. They knew its pressure & temperature was too high, but they failed in their mission to vent it, so they had to release more steam from the reactor into the suppression chamber anyway, because they were desperate to lower reactor vessel pressure so they could get some water pumped in. The site manager had already made plans for an evacuation, hours before the partial site evacuation actually took place. So with this in mind, its no surprise that when an explosive sound was heard and radiation levels on site climbed dramatically, they assumed the suppression chamber had failed.

And it may well have failed, all we can now rule out is that it failed in a manner where the torus was completely mangled, doors deformed etc.

The intriguing mysteries of reactor 2 only grow for me, because as we have seen from past surveys by humans & robots, there aren't the same sorts of highly contaminated areas at various locations within reactor 2 building that we see with reactor 1 (where various bits of equipment are well contaminated) or reactor 3 (where there were some very high levels of contamination to north-east and south-west of the drywell containment near to pipe penetrations and access doors). At reactor 2 we just have the highly contaminated water in the basement, and several hotspots on the refuelling level near to the concrete cap over containment, not much on any of the other reactor building floors with which we may gain clues about emission pathways.

 

[Yamanote]

Looks like a kind of unintended groundwater-corium-cooling-system to me. At least if any corium had reached the torus, it must have been cooled well by the groundwater inflow. Perhaps this is also one reason, why they keep the water level around OP 3000.

And if even the door to the torus room is damaged by the explosion in unit 3, I would expect severe damage inside the PCV too.

It will be an incredible effort to clean up this huge mess...

 

[zapperzero]

I will take this opportunity (the release of videos and announcement that survey work will begin in earnest there) to publicly plead with the moderators to unlock (or at least un-hide) the Unit 3 explosion thread. It's been quite a while, there is new stuff to discuss and I would like to at least have the old stuff available for reference.

 

[MadderDoc]

<..>The intriguing mysteries of reactor 2 only grow for me, because as we have seen from past surveys by humans & robots, there aren't the same sorts of highly contaminated areas at various locations within reactor 2 building that we see with reactor 1 (where various bits of equipment are well contaminated) or reactor 3 (where there were some very high levels of contamination to north-east and south-west of the drywell containment near to pipe penetrations and access doors).

I do know you have been intrigued by unit 2, if I remember correctly, centered about the question why such a large proportion of total emissions is assumed to have originated from unit 2. To me otoh unit 3 has remained the most vexing (while nothing really earthbreaking, I do feel quite a lot of new information on unit 3 has been surfacing since the thread specifically dealing with the unit 3 event was suspended by the moderators, -- and which I would like to turn about with like minded souls, but alas.) Unit 2 is also an interesting subject :-)

At reactor 2 we just have the highly contaminated water in the basement, and several hotspots on the refuelling level near to the concrete cap over containment, not much on any of the other reactor building floors with which we may gain clues about emission pathways.

I note that there's a rather straightforward radiation gradient down through the building along the staircase positioned in the NE corner of the service floor: that would seem to me to indicate strongly that airborne emissions from unit 2 escaped predominantly via the service floor. The exact route(s) it has taken from the RPV to the service floor is unclear, but it stands to reason that emission did pass through cracks and openings in and around the top concrete plugs.

 

[Borek]

I will take this opportunity (the release of videos and announcement that survey work will begin in earnest there) to publicly plead with the moderators to unlock (or at least un-hide) the Unit 3 explosion thread. It's been quite a while, there is new stuff to discuss and I would like to at least have the old stuff available for reference.

Sadly, the thread got damaged and its content is no longer available. I have no idea what have happened. As far as I can tell it was not physically removed, as it is still on the list of soft deleted threads - but it is empty.

 

[zapperzero]

Sadly, the thread got damaged and its content is no longer available. I have no idea what have happened. As far as I can tell it was not physically removed, as it is still on the list of soft deleted threads - but it is empty.

This is way beyond annoying. There was some good stuff in there, good sources that were cited. Perhaps some of it could be retrieved from Google cache, or from backups? There are backups, right?

 

[zapperzero]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=zfohHEQ7IP0#t=388s

An impromptu blow out ring!

EDIT: make that two
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfohHEQ7IP0&feature=player_detailpage#t=404s

LATER EDIT: Whatever it was, it was not inside those pipes. They look pristine. The overpressure came from below, from the 2nd basement level. Curiouser and curiouser.

 

[Borek]

This is way beyond annoying. There was some good stuff in there, good sources that were cited. Perhaps some of it could be retrieved from Google cache, or from backups? There are backups, right?

Question is - how long ago it happened. I don't know how long Greg keeps old backups, they are done to allow restoring the latest state in case of crash, not to keep track of everything that ever happened at forum. Besides, I doubt it is possible to restore just a single thread. But we will investigate, as it can be a sign of some serious problem.

 

[zapperzero]

Question is - how long ago it happened. I don't know how long Greg keeps old backups, they are done to allow restoring the latest state in case of crash, not to keep track of everything that ever happened at forum. Besides, I doubt it is possible to restore just a single thread. But we will investigate, as it can be a sign of some serious problem.

There should be incremental backup. It's a serious problem if there isn't :D

 

[Astronuc]

This is way beyond annoying. There was some good stuff in there, good sources that were cited. Perhaps some of it could be retrieved from Google cache, or from backups? There are backups, right?

Yes - it is beyond annoying. We don't understand what happened to the text. The thread is still in the dabase with stats. The content just vanished.

We do have a few posts from various reports, but that's insufficient to reconstruct the thread.

We've been looking into ways to restore/recover that thread.

Meanwhile - Evo discovered that Boardreader has a copy of some (much?) of that thread.
I suggest folks download as much as desired, and meanwhile we'll explore that avenue to recover what we can.

http://boardreader.com/thread/What_caused_the_big_explosion_at_fuku_re_14veXau5a.html

We have a backup of this thread as of Feb 04.

 

[clancy688]

http://boardreader.com/thread/What_caused_the_big_explosion_at_fuku_re_14veXau5a.html?o=0 here's the complete thread

The google cache version seems to be gone by now.Edit: Astronuc beat me... ^^

 

[elektrownik]

5 videos from unit 4 sfp: http://photo.tepco.co.jp/date/2012/201203-j/120316_02j.html

 

[shadowncs]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=zfohHEQ7IP0#t=388s

An impromptu blow out ring!

EDIT: make that two
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfohHEQ7IP0&feature=player_detailpage#t=404s

LATER EDIT: Whatever it was, it was not inside those pipes. They look pristine. The overpressure came from below, from the 2nd basement level. Curiouser and curiouser.

That's my impression also. SteveElbows said the floor below is common to the floor of the torus room - probably with some separation doors (which might be blown open, we won't know for a long time). To get that kind of lifting and door bulging a pressure spike (cause I can't imagine being sustained for long even by a nuclear reactor) must have come from the torus room of unit 3.
Even a 5psi spike (generating say 6-7 tons of force on the door) might be enough to bend that door and lift the rigs.

Which brings me back to unit 2, personally I can't see any way that a torus explosion could happen without damage to the doors. Unit 2 torus is probably leaky but not blown apart.

 

[jim hardy]

http://boardreader.com/thread/What_caused_the_big_explosion_at_fuku_re_14veXau5a.html?o=0 here's the complete thread

The google cache version seems to be gone by now.


Edit: Astronuc beat me... ^^

It only goes to post 170... is that all there were?

 

[Rive]

We have a backup of this thread as of Feb 04.

That should suffice, as I recall that topic were closed before that point.

 

[tsutsuji]

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-fukushima/20120316/index.html On 15 March, Tepco performed the first inspection into unit 4's reactor. It was confirmed that debris have sunk to the bottom and that large quantities of suspended particles are in the water. The camera was lowered by about 20 m from the top of the reactor. It was confirmed that two board-shaped debris have sunk to the bottom. Suspended particles, looking like white dust, are reflecting in the water. During the inspection into the fuel pool that was performed until 16 March, the visibility was reduced to 1 m instead of 5 m as before, and large quantities of suspended particles were observed. The start of the fuel removal is scheduled to take place by December 2013. Tepco said "It is possible that the water became muddy because of the suspended particles. Next year we shall need a 7 m transparency to remove the fuel, so we must study the causes of the suspended particles".

http://www.jiji.com/jc/c?g=soc_30&k=2012031601019 On 16 March, Tepco released pictures of the underwater inspection of unit 4's spent fuel pool. As was reported after the February underwater inspection, there is no major damage to the fuel, but thin debris are spread near the fuel assemblies' handles. Starting on 19 March, Tepco will perform a 3 day long full inspection of the pool to make a map of the debris. Tepco is planning to remove the debris with an underwater vacuum cleaner.

 

[Astronuc]

It only goes to post 170... is that all there were?

There were 709 posts (and 66 deleted posts) on 44+1 pages.

That should suffice, as I recall that topic were closed before that point.

We have a back of this (Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants) thread through Feb 04. It's a text back up without the attachments.

 

[Yamanote]

The start of the fuel removal is scheduled to take place by December 2013.

What is the reason for waiting so long? Is it not possible to pick the stuff out right now?

 

[zapperzero]

What is the reason for waiting so long? Is it not possible to pick the stuff out right now?

There is much to be done before that time. Just for starters, the pool and surrounding areas must be cleaned, transfer casks and other equipment must be made or otherwise acquired, personnel trained to do this unprecedented maneuver...

 

[nikkkom]

There is much to be done before that time. Just for starters, the pool and surrounding areas must be cleaned, transfer casks and other equipment must be made or otherwise acquired, personnel trained to do this unprecedented maneuver...

Well, Unit 4 is not that bad. It is not as contaminated as the other units.
They already cut off a significant part of upper, damaged levels of the building. It seems to be progressing nicely. Replacing the crane and other equipment, vacuuming the pool and starting to pull assemblies out would take 2 years from today?

 

[zapperzero]

Well, Unit 4 is not that bad. It is not as contaminated as the other units.
They already cut off a significant part of upper, damaged levels of the building. It seems to be progressing nicely. Replacing the crane and other equipment, vacuuming the pool and starting to pull assemblies out would take 2 years from today?

I don't think they will replace the crane.

 

[triumph61]

I don't think they will replace the crane.

Perhaps only the FHM.

 

[Yamanote]

I would guess it is in Tepco's interest to close the chapter of unit 4 as soon as possible to be able to focus on other important and difficult tasks (I see plenty of them...). And the more time passes, the higher is the risk that new problems from the pools might arise.

If they tell me end of 2012, ok. But end of 2013?
They know already for one year that they will have to get the stuff out of the pools, so it's not new to them. Maybe it is the debris in the pool or the water quality? But if so, what will be then at units 1 and 3, with half of the reactor buildings lying in the pools? Or perhaps the fuel bundles are simply still too hot to be handled in that way?

Would be interesting to know.

 

[Rive]

What is the reason for waiting so long? Is it not possible to pick the stuff out right now?

They have to (had to?) repair the common pool crane, then improve the reliability of the power source for the common pool.
It's also possible that some room must be made or arranged in the common pool, 1500 bundles of fuel is some decent amount.

On unit 4 top level they have to repair and secure the FHM machinery: rails, crane and so.

Arrange and transfer some transfer casks.

Make up plans, revise and and get permissions for the process. Train staff.

Run the work on the other units.

My personal feeling that if they can then they will jump as soon as possible and don't wait for the schedule, but actually the schedule looks OK for me - no hurry, and yet not lazy...

Ps.: as I know fuel bundles must wait 3-5 years after usage before they are ready for transfer in transfer casks. Some fuel in U4 pool might be ready for transfer right now, but for some even the end of 2013 might be too early. I don't know if this limit can be tricked by putting less fuel in a cask than it's capacity...

 

[tsutsuji]

My personal feeling that if they can then they will jump as soon as possible and don't wail for the schedule, but actually the schedule looks OK for me - no hurry, and jet not lazy...

At first Tepco wanted to take one more year, but this was refused by the government :

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-fukushima/20111109/1400_kouteihyo-shiji.html and http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-fukushima/20111109/1650_30nen.html The ministers of Industry (Edano) and Nuclear accident (Hosono) have asked Tepco to prepare a schedule where spent fuel pool fuel removal is started within 2 years after completion of step 2. This is one year earlier than recommended in the report from the middle and long term commission that was completed on 9 November.

 

[NUCENG]

Perhaps only the FHM.

FHM capacity is a few hundred pounds. Caskes weigh several tonnes. FHM has fine control needed to prevent damage to a fuel bundle. That is not something easy to achieve with a heavy lift crane.

 

[triumph61]

FHM capacity is a few hundred pounds. Caskes weigh several tonnes. FHM has fine control needed to prevent damage to a fuel bundle. That is not something easy to achieve with a heavy lift crane.

Thats right, but the FHM can take the Fuel into the Cask.

 

[MadderDoc]

This may be the missing Unit 3 refueling crane fallen into the spent-fuel pool as seen in an April, 14 2011 image here:

The graphic shows similar objects between this piece of wreckage in the Unit 3 pool and the intact Unit 4 refueling crane. It also shows a similar spatial conjunction of similar objects, and this meta-similarity makes me confident we're looking at Unit 3's refueling crane.

There are many pre-tsunami photos of the refueling crane here.

Why isn't the proposed refueling crane also bright green? My guess is that the fire that blasted out the south side over the pool and thus onto the crane scorched off the paint.

I feel this area of the SFP3 is a really good candidate for harbouring the missing FHM and its supporting bridge, however in the collection of wreckage I've found nothing really strikingly looking like it's matching parts of the FHM. The best I'd got is the green platform like object that is located submersed, just about where you have written 'railing?' in your photo montage. I think you are right that we shouldn't necessarily be looking for something standing in the original bright green colour.

From the same video source (taken by the crane camera on 18th of april 2011), I have a possible ID of the ladder that used to lead to the NW corner of the bridge which used to carry the FHM3.

If identified correctly, this ladder did end up not too far from its original position, where it got entangled in a fallen cross beam from the roof construction.

Below is a montage of an original photo of the ladder on the intact FHM bridge, some screen shots from the crane camera video, and a Tepco released photo from April 14th of the same ladder. I note the wrecked ladder has the same number, and same unusual positioning of steps, and it has what would represent the right hand rail still attached. While the left hand rail is missing, the Tepco released photo does display in a correct position what would represent remains of the two bolts that held it.

 

[MadderDoc]

At first Tepco wanted to take one more year, but this was refused by the government :

Fair to say, the environment in the SFP4 does remain unpleasantly corrosive (and the developed murkiness and the apparent caking on top of the assemblies might already have something to do with this.) Over a further 2+ year timeline, the prolonged corrosion could jam the assemblies in the racks, making it more difficult to remove them. I wonder how much aluminium alloy is in the pool, anybody knows?

 

[mscharisma]

I thought maybe some of you might find this article interesting, even though it's - thankfully - not of great consequence as far as what's going on at Daichi these days. It's about a cover-up of a defect in the reactor vessel of reactor 4.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-23/fukushima-engineer-says-he-covered-up-flaw-at-shut-reactor.html

 

[nuckelchen]

hi @ all

my name is ulli and i come from germany.
(germanium 71 )
i'm the one who made the masses of edited and timelapsed videos from and around fukuground.
mostly i worked with lapsed and captured streams from fukushima.

i'm not a physics-crack, i had studied *soziologie* and learned and worked as a bakerman too, special as a *bio-vollkorn-bäcker*.

and there i only does *reporting* visual moments from the boths streams.
i failed many times with my first optic impressions and that's okay.
because nobody will hurts by my wrong optical impressions and they based just on a single view and not on a nuclear-techno-study from 6 or 7 years.

but as japan/tepco is covering so much of all, included the optics,
i will find day per day more.
since january i didn't abled to work all the recorded stream time out...
there is to much stuff in it.
special @ the last two months.

so please take my posted videos as that what they are:
just an optic reported impression from a subject view or of a meaning of it.

i think that it will be importent for readers who searches some facts from fukuground, that the discussions in the public will be done correctly and fair.


and i didn't tricked on the videos, only sometimes a bit too much effected and too dramatic soundings...

i will give you all a sample from what i talk about.
remember you on the last poolr-video-releases from tepco in the last days.
(they putted them into a wrong frame size, played to fast and also the colors had a touch too much of tepcolors.)
first i fixed the frame-rate on that what it is, 'cause black-framed isn't usefull.
then i slomo them, shapened and color-editings on every video
and voilá,
here we go:
http://youtu.be/JXdPxd14rU8
http://youtu.be/v5-kXSi1ppA

to have a look how the *pool-area* should look normaly:
http://youtu.be/kvfvLEmMlro


i hope my first post cwill explain to you how i working on the streams and that i didn't "press" the stream-records in that sight, in that i wanne have them.

if there will be nothings to be reporten from the streams, perfect.

the endless drama from tepco had learned me
that only no news are good news...


achja,
one more I've got.
there is a new satellite picture from jan 2012, taken by astrium.
http://regard-sur-la-terre.over-blog.com/article-un-an-apres-le-tsunami-retour-a-fukushima-avec-le-satellite-pleiades-101454894.html
but they given it for free only in a 1111 pixel frame...so i made it a bitly bigger with "photo-zoom-pro-3", onto 4444 pixels.
http://www.img-teufel.de/thumbs/PleiadesJaponFukushima18012012copie3215651949cd7djpg.jpg

 

[zapperzero]

one more I've got.
there is a new satellite picture from jan 2012, taken by astrium.
http://regard-sur-la-terre.over-blog.com/article-un-an-apres-le-tsunami-retour-a-fukushima-avec-le-satellite-pleiades-101454894.html
but they given it for free only in a 1111 pixel frame...so i made it a bitly bigger with "photo-zoom-pro-3", onto 4444 pixels.
http://www.img-teufel.de/thumbs/PleiadesJaponFukushima18012012copie3215651949cd7djpg.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/geoeyesatelliteimagery/6985103913/lightbox/

 

[SteveElbows]

hi @ all

my name is ulli and i come from germany.
(germanium 71 )
i'm the one who made the masses of edited and timelapsed videos from and around fukuground.
mostly i worked with lapsed and captured streams from fukushima.

i'm not a physics-crack, i had studied *soziologie* and learned and worked as a bakerman too, special as a *bio-vollkorn-bäcker*.

and there i only does *reporting* visual moments from the boths streams.
i failed many times with my first optic impressions and that's okay.
because nobody will hurts by my wrong optical impressions and they based just on a single view and not on a nuclear-techno-study from 6 or 7 years.

but as japan/tepco is covering so much of all, included the optics,
i will find day per day more.
since january i didn't abled to work all the recorded stream time out...
there is to much stuff in it.
special @ the last two months.

so please take my posted videos as that what they are:
just an optic reported impression from a subject view or of a meaning of it.

Hello and welcome.

Your slowed down & colour altered videos from things like the reactor 4 fuel pool & reactor well may be of interest to people.

But I would avoid posting much about your TEPCO webcam & TBS feed videos as they do not tend to show anything of scientific interest, they are of little use to this forum. Most of what you will see is related to the weather and other atmospheric affects, nothing to do with the reactors. And the TEPCO webcam suffers from lots of compression artefacts, and if you sometimes see flashing lights in strange places on these videos then you should strongly consider the possibility that its actually a light being reflected off the dome that surrounds the camera.

 

[westfield]

hi @ all

my name is ulli and i come from germany.
(germanium 71 )

<snip >

achja,
one more I've got.
there is a new satellite picture from jan 2012, taken by astrium.
http://regard-sur-la-terre.over-blog.com/article-un-an-apres-le-tsunami-retour-a-fukushima-avec-le-satellite-pleiades-101454894.html
but they given it for free only in a 1111 pixel frame...so i made it a bitly bigger with "photo-zoom-pro-3", onto 4444 pixels.
[URL]http://www.img-teufel.de/thumbs/PleiadesJaponFukushima18012012copie3215651949cd7djpg.jpg[/PLAIN]

A Jan 2012 image of most the fukuichi site. Interesting view of the extent of the siteworks, tank farms etc.
(Unretouched, unscaled. 3300 x 3300 pixel geoEye satellite)

http://geoeyemediaportal.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/images/gallery/ge1/hires/fukushima_31JAN2012.jpg

March 2011 satellite images I hadnt seen before at this resolution

http://geoeyemediaportal.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/images/gallery/ge1/hires/japan_fukushima_daiichi_after_03_14_11.jpg


Satellite image within minutes of Unit 3 coming apart ( It's a very familiar image but in a higher resolution than I had seen before)

 

[duccio]

A Jan 2012 image of most the fukuichi site. Interesting view of the extent of the siteworks, tank farms etc.
(Unretouched, unscaled. 3300 x 3300 pixel geoEye satellite)

The sky on Fuku was quite crowded in those days... very interesting pics! Doubt: is the exhaust stack pipe of R3 missing? It is still there on the pic in which reactor 4 is still intact. Do you believe Tepco removed it, or it was blown away during the explosion of R4?

 

[SpunkyMonkey]

I feel this area of the SFP3 is a really good candidate for harbouring the missing FHM and its supporting bridge, however in the collection of wreckage I've found nothing really strikingly looking like it's matching parts of the FHM. The best I'd got is the green platform like object that is located submersed, just about where you have written 'railing?' in your photo montage.

I'm more drawn to the green platform-like object where I'm pointing. So I made this animation especially for you die-hard refueling-trolley deniers

​

The 'platform' object I'm talking about is clearly a coherent lattice of heavy-metal beams that appears to be roughly consistent with the I-beam undergirding of a refueling-trolly platform seen above and in this patent (Figure 3C). Not an exact match (and it's not the exact refueling trolley), but it would be the same structural concept. Additionally I also highlight the objects that look like pulleys to me, including another circular-seeming shape I just noticed deeper in. (Fyi, the http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/110311/images/110415_1f_4_2.jpg).

Further supporting my impression of identity is that the olive-green color of the Unit-3 refueling crane as it http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/MOXinstall3.jpg when the MOX fuel was loaded appears to be a close match to the olive-green color of both the proposed refueling-crane objects and the larger well-known overhead crane as it appeared late last year in this Tepco video. Those photos showing the refueling crane being olive-green can be found in press reports about the MOX installation.

So the question for U3-refueling-platform skeptics is: What large olive-green object with a lattice-girder platform and large pulley-like objects was over the fuel pool and was not the olive-green refueling platform?

From the same video source (taken by the crane camera on 18th of april 2011), I have a possible ID of the ladder that used to lead to the NW corner of the bridge which used to carry the FHM3.

Agreed, good ID! Any idea how what seems to be a roof girder became, it seems, co-mingled with a handle railing on the refueling ladder? And what's your source for the April 18 images of the ladder? I've not seen them before and can't find them on Tepco's site.

 

[tsutsuji]

So I made this animation

Animations such as this one are difficult to understand, because they leave hardly more than one second to watch each picture. Unlike videos on youtube, there is no pause button.

 

[MadderDoc]

<..>
Agreed, good ID! Any idea how what seems to be a roof girder became, it seems, co-mingled with a handle railing on the refueling ladder?

Presently I think something heavily hit the roof construction from aloft, pushing and smashing it down close to where the refueling bridge happened to be at the moment. On collision some parts of all parties naturally came loose and got intermingled. For the major part of them, refueling bridge and FHM ended up in the pool. As indicated, that's just my thoughts at the moment:

And what's your source for the April 18 images of the ladder? I've not seen them before and can't find them on Tepco's site.

It is from some time last year when Tepco released a collection of previously unpublished material, among which were two videos with a total of 50 minutes of capture from the concrete pump camera on April 18. The collection was published only temporarily, timing out by the end of 2011. The link to the collection was posted here, but I believe the link is now dead, (otherwise I should think I'd retained it as a bookmark, which I haven't.) However I retained a.o. grabs of those two videos. Check your mailbox..

 

[zapperzero]

Has this been discussed before? (got to it via ex-skf blog)

http://www.asahi.com/national/update/0603/TKY201106030539.html

"8:30 am on March 12, [tellurium?] was measured and Okuma-machi Namie-machi, Minami Soma City prior to the explosion of Unit 1 and hydrogen vent work" (google translation, sorry, I know no Japanese, this may be very wrong).

This is before even the first attempt at venting, no?

 

[tsutsuji]

Has this been discussed before? (got to it via ex-skf blog)

http://www.asahi.com/national/update/0603/TKY201106030539.html

"8:30 am on March 12, [tellurium?] was measured and Okuma-machi Namie-machi, Minami Soma City prior to the explosion of Unit 1 and hydrogen vent work" (google translation, sorry, I know no Japanese, this may be very wrong).

This is before even the first attempt at venting, no?

Be careful that the Asahi article says "from 8:30 AM to 1:30 PM on March 12". Otherwise your translation is correct.

The data released by the NISA on 3 June 2011 are available at http://www.meti.go.jp/press/2011/06/20110603019/20110603019-2.pdf

I translate the first line of the table page 18/24 :

List of monitoring results in the surroundings of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station (atmospheric suspended dust)

Radiation concentrations (Bq/m³):

Sampling location              Measurement time             I-131  Cs-134 Cs-137 I-132 Te-132 other substances  done by                   page number       notes
Nishihara, Takase, Namie   2011/03/12 08:39 ~ 08:49      37                 1.8      90       73                          Fukushima prefecture          1

See also the maps on pages 18/24 ("page 1") to 22/24 ("page 4")

The yellow lines are marked with "in part already publicly released" in the "notes" column.

In http://www.meti.go.jp/press/2011/06/20110603019/20110603019-3.pdf they explain that the previously released data are those of the 21st report (13 March 2011 at 20:30 PM) and 22nd report (14 March at 7:30 AM) :

In the report of 13 March 2011 at 20:30 PM : http://www.meti.go.jp/press/20110313007/20110313007-4.pdf I find the data measured in Front of Fukushima prefecture Atomic Energy Center at 16:00 on 13 March with 1.7 Bq/m³ of Iodine 131 and ND for Tellurium. English version here : http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/files/en20110313-6.pdf (page 14/15)

In the report of 14 March 2011 at 07:30 AM : http://www.meti.go.jp/press/20110314001/20110314001-3.pdf I find the data measured in Front of Fukushima prefecture Atomic Energy Center at 08:00 ~ 08:10 AM on 13 March : 5.8 Bq/m³ of Iodine 131 and 1.7 Bq/m³ of Tellurium 132.