KE of Electrons to give same theta as light in double slit diffraction

Silly Sausage
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Coherent light is passed through two narrow slits whose separation is d. The second-order bright fringe in the interference pattern is located at an angle of theta.

If electrons are used instead of light, what must the kinetic energy of the electrons be if they are to produce an interference pattern for which the second-order maximum is also at theta?

Homework Equations



No relevant equations givven

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I started by saying that the wavelength of the electrons will be the same as the wavelength of light, and thought of using h=p lambda and then E=hf.

However I then confused myself because for h=p lamba I need the momentum and for that I need the speed. E=hf will give me kinetic energy wouldn't it? Can I please have some hints and pointers as to what direction I should be thinking in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silly Sausage said:
Well, I started by saying that the wavelength of the electrons will be the same as the wavelength of light, and thought of using h=p lambda
Good. Use that to find the momentum of the electrons.
and then E=hf.
That would apply for photons, not electrons.

How does momentum relate to kinetic energy?
 
OK. I used Ek = p^2/(2m) and h=p lambda

to give Ek= h^2/(lambda^2*2m)

now do I use n lmbda = dsin theta?
 
done it! thanks guys!
 
Sounds good to me.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top