Kepler's 3rd law - which object in numerator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aphysicsmanduh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
When applying Kepler's 3rd law to determine the orbital period or radius of two objects, the choice of which object to assign as "A" or "B" does not affect the outcome, as the formula is symmetrical. The key is to ensure that the correct values for the periods and radii are used consistently. Errors in calculations may arise from misapplying the formula, particularly in handling square roots. In the example of Ganymede and Io, either object can be placed in the numerator or denominator without changing the result, as long as the corresponding values are correctly matched. Understanding the relationship between the objects and their masses is crucial for accurate calculations.
aphysicsmanduh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi folks! I have been searching and searching and cannot come up with a clear answer. When applying Kepler's 3rd law to 2 objects to solve for an unknown period or radius, which orbiting object (satellite) is in the numerator and which is in the denominator?

Here is the formula I am referring to:

( TA / TB )^2 = (RA / RB)^3

so if you're solving for orbiting period you would have TA = √(RA/RB)^3 * TB^2

I get different answers if I switch them so there must be some sort of "rule" that tells me which object is "A" and which is "B". From my searching, it looks like period and radius "A" are for the less massive object. I also wasn't sure if it had something to do with which object was closest to original object being orbited. An example is the moons of Jupiter. If I was trying to find the period of Ganymede given its radius and the info. for Io, which object would be the numerator and which would be the denominator in Kepler's 3rd law equation.

Any help would be great so I can sleep tonight! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this what you're looking for?

T=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{a^3}{G(m_1+m_2)}}

"a" is the sum of the semi major axis of the two bodies.
 
It doesn't matter which is which.

The erroneous results might be due to:

aphysicsmanduh said:
TA = √(RA/RB)^3 * TB^2

Perchance you've lost a square root there?

TA = √(RA/RB)^3 * √TB^2
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top