Kikuchi lines Vs Kikuchi bands (EBSD in SEM)

  • Thread starter Thread starter antonni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Sem
AI Thread Summary
Kikuchi bands in electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) are formed by variations in Bragg diffraction, resulting in bright bands on a dark background, often appearing between two dark lines. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the formation of these bands and their relationship to the underlying diffused background of scattering. While some references provide insights into EBSD pattern formation, a clear explanation of the mechanisms behind the pseudo-kikuchi bands remains elusive. The capture angle in SEM is noted to be greater, contributing to the complexity of the observed patterns. Overall, the topic is recognized as intricate, with limited consensus on the underlying physics.
antonni
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Good day,
anyone can point out to me how kikuchi bands are formed? And I mean bands, not lines. I finally managed to understand (I think) kikuchi lines: bragg diffraction is decreased in the incident direction (defecit=darker line) and enhanced in the "bragg" direction (excess=brighter line) and all this happens above the diffused background (backscattered electrons in all directions basically), which covers all the phosphor screen quite evenly throughout. And please correct me if I am wrong.

I did saw some TEM pictures where this phenomena can be seen. I also, however saw kikuchi bands: bright bands on a fairly dark background, confined between, what seems to me, 2 dark lines:
silicon_EBSP.jpg

here you can see this (the middle band). Is this just an "eye illusion"? it seems that for any excess kikuchi line, forming one boundary of the band, with its darker parallel twin (the defecit kikuchi line) where is a DARK region, or DARK LINE just near to it, on other pictures it is a lot clearer and it seems that the kikuchi band is confined between to DARK DEFECIT LINES. IS IT? If so, what happened to the excess line?
2007910151531.gif


Another question: I understand that the band is 2theta(bragg) wide, but what happens in between I do not understand. What I understand is that the the in between the lines is just the diffused background of the scattering.

Anyone who can shed some light on the formation and origin of this contrast in the EBSD patterns from SEM, his contribution will be much appreciated. I have to prepare a little slide show and tell my colleagues at work about EBSD- which is something new we going to have here with our SEM soon, so I have to be "sort off" the expert. So to start with it can be nice to know these little details.

Thanks

Anton
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guess no SEM experts here :)
Got tons of books- finally found one ("Introduction to texture analysis") that actually addresses the difference between kikuchi bands in SEM a.k.a EBSD (pseudo-kikuchi bands they are called, it turns out) and TEM (kikuchi bands)...but of course, surprise surprise...no clear explanation, non at all, to why we have the bands between actually two dark lines or why the capture angle in SEM is greater and other issues...seen everything the net has to offer I think on the subject. The pseudo-kikuchi band is a mystery.
It seems the subject is very obscure and no one actually knows why we see what we see on the detectors screen
 
Hi Anton,

The topic is not trivial, actually.
I have tried to explain EBSD pattern formation in these references:

"Principles of depth-resolved Kikuchi pattern simulation for electron backscatter diffraction"
A. WINKELMANN
Journal of Microscopy 239, (2010) 32–45
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03353.x/abstract

And in this chapter:
http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9780387881355-c2.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-749108-p173906909
http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9780387881355-c2.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-749108-p173906909
in:
Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science
Schwartz, A.J.; Kumar, M.; Adams, B.L.; Field, D.P. (Eds.)
2nd ed., 2009, ISBN: 978-0-387-88135-5 DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-88136-2_2Aimo.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top