Kinematics Rolling motion off a cliff

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a kinematics problem involving a solid sphere rolling off a roof after descending an inclined plane. The user successfully calculated the sphere's velocity at the edge of the roof using conservation of energy but struggled with determining the angle of departure and the horizontal distance it traveled. Clarifications were sought regarding the definitions of horizontal distance and the angle of inclination, as these are crucial for applying free-fall equations. Ultimately, the user realized that the solution was simpler than anticipated, requiring a return to basic horizontal motion equations. The problem was resolved, highlighting the importance of fundamental concepts in physics.
Varaia
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So I'm sure most everyone has come across the problem where you have a smooth rolling object on an inclined plain that rolls off a roof or something and falls some distance x away from the roof. I can solve that because it usually gives me the distance along the incline and the angle of inclination and we assume conservation of energy and then use free fall equations and blah blah blah. What I can't seem to do is solve the last part of this problem where I'm given:
A solid sphere of of negligable mass and radius so I=2/5M(Rsquared)
Smooth rolling so we assume r(omega)=Vcom
From an initial height of H=6.0 m along a very wavy descent to a final height of h=2.0 m where it falls off the edge and
using the conservation of energy and plugging our stuff in
at the end of the roof the Vcom= 5.29 m/(s) and the average speed=7.23m/s (found first part easy)
I assume that the acceleration is constant (gravity) but that only comes into play on the last part because the normal force cancels it out while it is on the crazy ramp.
so now where do I go from here to find the angle so I can calculate t and then calculate the distance it fell horizontally d to point A that is directly below the edge of the 2.0m roof. The answer is 4.8m but when I can't find my all my values to plug into my quadratic equation it is kinda pointless. I know it is some simple relation that I can't remember. I would like to use the freefall relationships but without my angle it doesn't mean anything. Is there an easier way?
x(not)=0 Vx(not)=Vcos(theta) y=h=2.0m Vy(not)=-Vsin(theta)
y=h-(Vsin(theta))t -1/2g(t(squared))
Distance=Vcos(theta)t
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle at which it leaves the roof? If that isn't given somewhere in the geometry of the situation, there isn't any way to calculate it. Exactly what is given?

And what in the world do you mean by "the distance it fell horizontally d to point A that is directly below the edge of the 2.0m roof"? If it feel to a point directly below the roof isn't the horizontal distance 0? Or do you not really mean "directly below"?
 
If some how one can find the distance it traveled along the roof , the angle of inclination can be found since we know the vertical displacement of the center of mass.
 
Here is the problem and I attached a picture (you'll love my mad photoshop skills)
In the picture a solid ball rolls smoothly from rest (starting at height H=6.0m) until it leaves the horizontal section at the end of the track at height h=2.0m. How far horizontally from point A does the ball hit the floor?

If anyone has spent the money to buy the student solutions manual to the 7th ed of Halliday/Resnicks Fundamentals of Physics this problem is in there as #9 in Chp 11

I should know how to do it by tomorrow and then I'll post the process because dang this was a tuffie.
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    2.8 KB · Views: 552
Last edited:
Got it! and boy do I feel dumb

:-p So it was a much easier problem than I was making it out to be, had to go back all the way to Chp 3 for simple horizontal motion equation and then figured it out from there. Thanks for helping.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top