Kinetic Energy and Parabolic Motion

AI Thread Summary
The kinetic energy (K.E.) of a shell fired at an angle can be calculated using its horizontal velocity at the highest point, as the vertical velocity is zero at that moment. The formula for K.E. is K.E. = 0.5(m)(v)^2, where 'm' is mass and 'v' is the horizontal component of velocity. For a shell of mass 50 kg fired at 200 m/s at a 60-degree angle, the horizontal velocity is 100 m/s, resulting in a K.E. of 2.5 x 10^5 J. The horizontal component remains unchanged throughout the projectile's flight, confirming that K.E. is not zero at the peak.
thoradicus
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A shell of mass 50kg is fired at 60 degress to the horizontal with a speed of 200 m/s. Neglecting air resistance,calculate the kinetic energy of the shell at the highest point.


Homework Equations


K.E=.5(m)(v)^2
usin(θ)
ucos(θ)


The Attempt at a Solution


My question is shouldn't the K.E of the shell is 0? Since the vertical velocity is zero at the highest point. Should I use horizontal velocty instead? why is that so?

If i use horizontal velocity: 200cos60=100
K.E=(1/2)(50)(100)^2=2.5*10^5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thoradicus said:
My question is shouldn't the K.E of the shell is 0? Since the vertical velocity is zero at the highest point. Should I use horizontal velocty instead? why is that so?
You need the total velocity to calculate the KE. But since the vertical component is zero at the highest point, all you need is the horizontal component.

If i use horizontal velocity: 200cos60=100
K.E=(1/2)(50)(100)^2=2.5*10^5
Exactly. (Don't forget units.)
 
thoradicus said:

Homework Statement


A shell of mass 50kg is fired at 60 degress to the horizontal with a speed of 200 m/s. Neglecting air resistance,calculate the kinetic energy of the shell at the highest point.


Homework Equations


K.E=.5(m)(v)^2
usin(θ)
ucos(θ)


The Attempt at a Solution


My question is shouldn't the K.E of the shell is 0? Since the vertical velocity is zero at the highest point. Should I use horizontal velocty instead? why is that so?

If i use horizontal velocity: 200cos60=100
K.E=(1/2)(50)(100)^2=2.5*10^5

KE is the energy of motion. The shell is still moving when it's at its zenith (it's moving horizontally).

You could calculate the KE in terms of components, vertical and horizontal, then add them like you add vector components to find the magnitude. But since you know that the vertical component is zero when the shell is at its maximum height, the calculation simplifies to being just the KE due to the horizontal component.
 
yes u have to use the horizontal component of velocity in this case.
remember the velocity is zero at the topmost point only when the projectile is fired vertically, i.e, with zero horizontal component of velocity. if it is fired with some angle other than 90 deg with the horizontal it has a non zero velocity at the top. that velocity = the initial horizontal component of the velocity. this remains unchanged through out the flight as the gravitational force is a vertical (downward) one and as such can not affect the horizontal component of velocity.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top