Kinetic Energy v. Time Graph for Freefall

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about graphing kinetic energy over time for a rock in freefall, it is confirmed that the kinetic energy increases exponentially rather than linearly. This is due to the relationship between velocity and time, where velocity increases as the rock falls. The formula for kinetic energy, 1/2mv^2, indicates that since velocity is squared, the increase in kinetic energy is not linear. Participants agree that the curve representing kinetic energy over time will reflect this exponential growth. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurately representing the graph.
Asleky
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Pretty simple question, just checking for confirmation. It was a small question at the beginning of a summative test, a rock was dropped off of a bridge and we were asked to graph the kinetic energy over time.

Homework Equations



1/2mv^2.

The Attempt at a Solution


I started from 0 and went upwards (exponentially). Two friends were telling me I was wrong. :( Who was right? They say it's a linear line, but I disagreed because of the v^2. Thanks for any insight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just think of the relationship of v with t for free fall.
 
Asleky said:
exponentially
Do you mean exponentially? You are right that it is not linear.
 
Let'sthink said:
Just think of the relationship of v with t for free fall.
Yeah, velocity increases. Then it is squared in the formula for kinetic energy.
 
Asleky said:
Yeah, velocity increases. Then it is squared in the formula for kinetic energy.
Right, so what adjective will describe the curve?
 
  • Like
Likes Physics-Tutor
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top