Kinetic friction find greatest acceleration

Sneaky07
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. A crate resting on a rough horizontal floor is to be moved horizontally. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.40. To start the crate moving with the least possible applied force, in what direction should the force be applied?

a. Horizontal

b. 24 degrees below horizontal

c. 22 degrees above the horizontal

d. 24 degrees above the horizontal

e. 66 degrees below the horizontal
Formulas I used.
2. (Normal force) Fn = m*a
(Kinetic frictional force) Fk = (uk)*|Fn| (uk being coefficient of kinetic friction)

Work I did.
3. Figured out the normal force which was m*a*cos(theta). After I multiplied it by the (uk) and got kinetic frictional force but don't know where to go from there...

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Sneaky07 said:
1. A crate resting on a rough horizontal floor is to be moved horizontally. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.40. To start the crate moving with the least possible applied force, in what direction should the force be applied?

Figured out the normal force which was m*a*cos(theta). After I multiplied it by the (uk) and got kinetic frictional force but don't know where to go from there...

Thanks in advance!


Hi Sneaky07! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a mu: µ :wink:)

However did you get m*a*cos(theta)? :confused:

Hint: this is a straightforward Newton's second law problem …

call the force "F", then take vertical components and horizontal components (separately), to get two equations for F. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top