How Do Kirchhoff's Laws Apply to a Capacitor in a Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saraphim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Law
AI Thread Summary
Kirchhoff's laws are applied to analyze a circuit with a capacitor, leading to the formulation of a differential equation for the charge on the capacitor. The node law indicates that the current through the capacitor branch is related to the currents in other branches. The discussion reveals confusion about identifying independent meshes within the circuit, with three mesh equations derived but one deemed non-independent. A suggestion is made to omit the redundant mesh equation and focus on the remaining two to express the currents in terms of the charge. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in selecting independent equations to solve the problem effectively.
Saraphim
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem considers the diagram in the photo that I have attached. Apologies for the poor quality, but sketching it on my computer would have been even worse!

a) Write down Kirchhoff's laws for the circuit and show that when the switch is closed, the charge on the capacitor Q behaves according to:
\frac{R_2}{R_1+R_2}\epsilon = \frac{Q}{C}+\left(R_3+\frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1+R_2}\right)\frac{dQ}{dt}

Homework Equations


The current through the branch with the capacitor, I_3, can be described by dQ/dt.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, Kirchhoff's laws.

The node law says that I_1=I_2+I_3.

Then the mesh laws, I get three meshes:

\epsilon=I_1 R_1 + I_2 R_2
\epsilon=I_1 R_1 + I_3 R_3+ \frac{Q}{C}
0=I_3 R_3 + \frac{Q}{C} - I_2 R_2

I'm fairly sure those are correct, however, I can't figure out how to combine these to show the differential equation given in the problem statement. I think I must leave out one of the relations obtained from the mesh law, but I have no idea where to start, or how to proceed in any sort of methodical way. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated, I'm sure I can work it out if I just get a nudge in the right direction!
 

Attachments

  • diag.jpg
    diag.jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 381
Physics news on Phys.org
Saraphim said:



\epsilon=I_1 R_1 + I_2 R_2
\epsilon=I_1 R_1 + I_3 R_3+ \frac{Q}{C}
0=I_3 R_3 + \frac{Q}{C} - I_2 R_2



The circuit contains two independent meshes. Omit the third mesh equation, it is not independent from the previous ones. Use the equation I1=I2+I3 and the first mesh equation to get I1 in terms of I3. Substitute for I1 in the second mesh equation. Use dQ/dt for I3.

ehild
 
So the first independent mesh is the one containing R1 and R3 and the other containing R3 and R2?
 
Wait, no, that's wrong. I'll think on it some more.
 
I can't seem to find out which two meshes are independent. :rolleyes:
 
Any two ones. ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top