Kirchoff voltage law to transistor circuits?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL) to derive equations for the base-emitter and collector-emitter sides of a transistor circuit. The initial equation presented, IERE + I1R2 = -VBE, is scrutinized for accuracy, particularly regarding the direction of current flow and the signs used in calculations. It is emphasized that the base current affects voltage readings, making simple voltage divider approximations potentially inadequate in practical circuits. Participants suggest using an equivalent circuit model for clarity in writing loop equations and stress the importance of clearly defining known and unknown values in the analysis. Overall, careful attention to current direction and sign conventions is crucial for accurate application of KVL in transistor circuits.
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to know how to arrive at the equation for the base emitter side and collector emitter side of a transistor using kirchhoff voltage law.


Homework Equations


Kirchoff voltage law is \sumV = \sum IR.
Please refer my attachment in which i have to arrive an equation for base emitter side. So starting from the point O i proceed in the direction given in red arrows which gives
IERE+I1R2 = -VBE
Am i correct? Similarly help is needed to arrive the same to the collector emitter side.


The Attempt at a Solution




 

Attachments

  • IMG1_0001.jpg
    IMG1_0001.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 827
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the base is drawing some (small) current, the voltage at the base will not be precisely the value given by a simple voltage divider action of the the base bias resistors R1 and R2. If R1 and R2 happen to be relatively small in value and they carry a current between Vcc and ground that is much greater than the base current, then the approximation may be adequate. Usually this is not the case (in a practical circuit it would be a wast of power).

You might want to look for a simple equivalent circuit model with which to replace the transistor in the circuit so that you can write the loop equations. Maybe something like this:

attachment.php?attachmentid=37993&stc=1&d=1313333193.gif


[Image source: http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~jones/es154/lectures/lecture_3/bjt_models/bjt_models.html ]
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    12.5 KB · Views: 2,458
From the diagram it appears I1 is defined as flowing downward, yet your (red arrows) loop defines it flowing upward. So you need to change its sign.

Secondly, you did not make clear what values are given and what are unknown. From your text it is clear that Vbe is unknown, but what about the other symbols on the diagram? Are we to assume all other symbols on the diagram are given?
 
Mr. fleem, the arrow mark in the red is the direction i proceed in a closed loop for arriving the kirchhoff voltage law.
This is a voltage divider bias used in npn transistor.
 
logearav said:
Mr. fleem, the arrow mark in the red is the direction i proceed in a closed loop for arriving the kirchhoff voltage law.
This is a voltage divider bias used in npn transistor.

Yes, but I'm just saying be careful to keep track of the sign of the current. Since the red arrows point opposite the direction of the current defined in the diagram, so (assuming) you've been given the value for that current in the diagram, you must change its sign to match the definition used by the red arrows.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top