Kirchoff's current law for an opamp

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to an operational amplifier (op-amp) circuit. Participants clarify that a closed boundary should be drawn around the op-amp, including the relevant connecting wires. The equation i2 + i3 + i7 - i4 - i6 = 0 is confirmed to be correct, with the understanding that for an ideal op-amp, currents i2 and i3 are negligible. The significance of current magnitudes is emphasized, prompting analysis of where the majority of current flows in the circuit. Understanding these current relationships is crucial for grasping op-amp functionality.
-EquinoX-
Messages
561
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3939/opamp.jpg

Draw an imaginary boundary around the op-amp, and apply KCL at the five wires that intersect the boundary

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am having quite a problem understanding the question above... which boundary should I draw around? Could someone point this out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You draw a closed line around the op-amp that contains only the opamp and a part of the 5 wires that connect to it. According to KCL the sum of all the currents going into the opamp
must be 0.

This is an extremely unhelpful exercise, if the goal is understanding op-amps.
 
so is it:
i2 + i3 + i7 -i4 - i6 = 0

is this true?

based on the number that is there?
 
-EquinoX- said:
so is it:
i2 + i3 + i7 -i4 - i6 = 0

is this true?

based on the number that is there?

Yes. Of course, with an ideal op-amp I2 and i3 will be 0.
 
Now what does it mean when the question asks:

Discuss the significance of the relative current magnitudes??

what kind of answer should I provide?
 
I2 will be very small, and I3 will be very small .
which of the other currents would YOU like to be small?
Tell where you think most of the current comes from, and where most of it goes to .
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top