Kirchoff's Laws: Solving Simultaneous Equations for Circuit Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Knissp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's Laws to solve for currents in a circuit, specifically the current through a 0.75-ohm resistor. Participants analyze simultaneous equations derived from the node and loop rules, noting confusion about voltage signs and potential differences. A key point raised is the incorrect application of Ohm's Law, particularly regarding the potential difference across the 0.75-ohm resistor. Clarifications are sought on whether it is appropriate to combine voltages across resistors and how to correctly account for them in the equations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately determining potential differences to solve circuit problems effectively.
Knissp
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Kirchoff's Laws

Homework Statement


A link to the problem statement is provided here: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5305/kirchoffry1.png
(with one modification: the question should read find the current in the .75 ohm resistor)

Homework Equations


Ohm's Law: R=delta(V)/I
loop rule: sum(changes in potentials) = 0 (for closed loop)
junction rule: because of conservation of charge, the currents follow such that:
I_1 + I_2 = I_3


The Attempt at a Solution


I am supposed to solve a set of simultaneous linear equations. The first one is simply the node equation
I_1+I_2=I_3.
Then by looking at the top loop, I have:
2.25 - (I_2)*(3) - (I_3) * (4.2) = 0
The next part is what I am somewhat confused about.
I can either make one of two loops for the final equations: the bottom one with the middle wire included, or the top and bottom one as a whole.
For just the bottom loop, I get:
4.75 - (I_1)*(.75) + 1 - (I_1)*(1.2) + (I_2)*(3) +2.25 = 0
I am not sure if this is right because I don't know if it is appropriate to add the voltages 1 and 4.75 when they have the resistor between them. Perhaps I am supposed to use their potential difference? But then in that case, the .75 ohms would be internal resistance and I don't have any emf. And, I think it is probably incorrect to assume that the current going through the 1.2 ohm resistor is the same as I_1.
For the whole loop (the biggest one which does not include the middle wire), I get:
4.75 - (I_1)*(.75) + 1 - (I_1)*(1.2) - (I_3)*(4.2) = 0
When I solve this simultaneously with the first two equations, I get a different answer from when I solve the first three simultaneously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
EDIT: sorry for double posting, but maybe I should rephrase my question since nobody has offered any assistance.

Why doesn't Ohm's Law work? The potential difference is (4.74-1) V or 3.75 V, applying Ohm's Law, delta(V)/R= I, so 3.75/.75 = 5 A but that is incorrect. Why?
 
Knissp said:
4.75 - (I_1)*(.75) + 1 - (I_1)*(1.2) + (I_2)*(3) +2.25 = 0

.

You have the sign of the 2.25 V voltage source wrong.
 
Knissp said:
EDIT: sorry for double posting, but maybe I should rephrase my question since nobody has offered any assistance.

Why doesn't Ohm's Law work? The potential difference is (4.74-1) V or 3.75 V, applying Ohm's Law, delta(V)/R= I, so 3.75/.75 = 5 A but that is incorrect. Why?

Because your potential difference across the 0.75 ohm resistance is wrong. I can see no reason why it would have that value.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top