Kirchoff's Rule(How do I find equivalent resistance?)

AI Thread Summary
To find the equivalent resistance in the given circuit, it's essential to correctly identify which resistors are in series and parallel, as simply adding resistances won't work due to the circuit's complexity. The user provided loop equations and current values but initially misunderstood the method for calculating equivalent resistance. It's highlighted that recognizing the configuration of resistors is crucial, and there are additional resistors that can simplify the process. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing effort in problem-solving rather than seeking direct answers. Ultimately, understanding the circuit's layout leads to a clearer path for calculating equivalent resistance.
jawhnay
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Please take a look at the attachment to see the circuit. My question is how do I find the equivalent resistance of this circuit? I have done the other two parts but this part has got me stumped. I also drew my currents on the picture.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to categorize which resistors were in parallel and in series to each other but that just got me really confused... If anyone can walk me through this problem it would be greatly appreciated.

Here are my loop equations:

-9I1+3I2+9I3+8I4 = -12
-3I3 = -12
-6I1-4I2+6I3+6I4 = -12
-I1+I2+I3-5I4 = -12

I1 = 7.324841
I2 = 0.878981
I3 = 4
I4 = 1.910828

current across the 5 ohm resistor = 1.911 amps
Vab = -8.484 volts
 

Attachments

  • kirchoff.png
    kirchoff.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 587
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to write loop equations? You need to show some effort on your own so we know where you are stumped. Just giving the answer is against forum rules.

EDIT: "walking you through it" is equivalent to giving the answer. We're more into hints.
 
yes, I know how to write loop equations. However, I thought the equivalent resistance was just adding up the resistances so I didn't think I would need to show my loop equations. I have edited my first post with the loop equations and edited picture.
 
Last edited:
Since you have the current being drawn out of the 12V supply, you have the equivalent resistance, yes?

The problem is that "adding up the resistances" just doesn't work unless everything is simple series/parallel combinations and you've already figured out that that is not the case with this circuit else you would have been able to do it.
 
oh my gosh, I cannot believe I didn't see it. Thank you for the help!
 
Last edited:
phinds said:
Since you have the current being drawn out of the 12V supply, you have the equivalent resistance, yes?

The problem is that "adding up the resistances" just doesn't work unless everything is simple series/parallel combinations and you've already figured out that that is not the case with this circuit else you would have been able to do it.

Actually, if you note that there are "missing" resistors on the diagonals you might see that direct simplification is quite possible. Easy in fact :smile:

attachment.php?attachmentid=58108&stc=1&d=1366631112.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2.1 KB · Views: 720
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top