Kleppner/Kolenkow: Conical Pendulum & Angle with Vertical

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing a conical pendulum where a mass hangs from a rotating rod. The key equations derived include the balance of forces acting on the mass, leading to the relationship between the angle α and the angular frequency ω. It is established that for ω greater than the critical value √(g/l), there are two possible solutions for α, while for smaller ω, the only solution is α = 0. Participants clarify that the rotation of the rod does not affect the radius, and the problem can be framed to yield a single solution without canceling terms. The conclusion emphasizes the existence of multiple solutions based on the angular frequency, highlighting the complexity of the pendulum's behavior.
Cosmophile
Messages
111
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Mass ##M## hangs from a string of length ##l## which is attached to a rod rotating at constant angular frequency ##\omega##. The mass moves with a steady speed in a circular path of constant radius. Find ##\alpha##, the angle the string makes with the vertical.

Homework Equations


There are only two forces acting on the mass:

1) ##T##, the tension of the string.
2) ##W##, the weight of the mass.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For starters, I find \Sigma F_y = T\cos\alpha - W = 0 \qquad. (1) Since the radius is constant, ##a_r = \ddot {r} - r \dot {\theta}^2## simplifies to ##-r\dot {\theta}^2 = -r\omega ^2##.

The component of ##T## in the direction of the radius is
T\sin\alpha = mr \omega ^2. \qquad (2) From here, I substitute ##r = l \sin\theta## and get T\sin\alpha = Ml \omega^2 \sin\alpha \qquad (3)
T = Ml \omega^2 \qquad \qquad (4)

Substituting ##(4)## into ##(1)## we get ##Ml\omega^2 \cos\alpha = W##. Since ##W = Mg##, we have \cos \alpha = \frac {g}{\omega^2l}.

This makes physical sense if ##\omega > \sqrt{\frac {g}{l}}##. As ##\omega \rightarrow \infty##, ##\cos \alpha \rightarrow 0## and ##\alpha \rightarrow \pi /2##. That being said, when ##\omega## is small, the result breaks down, as it implies ##\cos \alpha \rightarrow \infty##.

I realize that the issue is when I go from ##(3)## to ##(4)##, as I divide by ##\sin\alpha##, but that isn't allowed when ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac {g}{l}}##, as this gives ##\cos \alpha = 1 \implies \sin \alpha = 0##.

K&K explain that in doing the problem, we overlooked a second solution, namely, ##\sin \alpha = 0, T = W##. They then say:

"Physically, for ##\omega \leq \sqrt {g/l}##, the only acceptable solution is ##\alpha = 0, \cos\alpha = 1##. For ##\omega > \sqrt{g/l}##, there are two solutions: \cos \alpha = 1 \cos\alpha = \sqrt{\frac{g}{\omega^2 l}}

I'm having a difficult time understanding why this is the case. Is there no way to come up with one solution which suffices on its own?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cosmophile said:

Homework Statement


Mass ##M## hangs from a string of length ##l## which is attached to a rod rotating at constant angular frequency ##\omega##. The mass moves with a steady speed in a circular path of constant radius. Find ##\alpha##, the angle the string makes with the vertical.

Homework Equations


There are only two forces acting on the mass:

1) ##T##, the tension of the string.
2) ##W##, the weight of the mass.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For starters, I find \Sigma F_y = T\sin\alpha - W = 0 \qquad. (1) Since the radius is constant, ##a_r = \ddot {r} - r \dot {\theta}^2## simplifies to ##-r\dot {\theta}^2 = -r\omega ^2##.

The component of ##T## in the direction of the radius is
T\sin\alpha = mr \omega ^2. \qquad (2) From here, I substitute ##r = l \sin\theta## and get T\sin\alpha = Ml \omega^2 \sin\alpha \qquad (3)
T = Ml \omega^2 \qquad \qquad (4)

Substituting ##(4)## into ##(1)## we get ##Ml\omega^2 \cos\alpha = W##. Since ##W = Mg##, we have \cos \alpha = \frac {g}{\omega^2l}.

This makes physical sense if ##\omega > \sqrt{\frac {g}{l}}##. As ##\omega \rightarrow \infty##, ##\cos \alpha \rightarrow 0## and ##\alpha \rightarrow \pi /2##. That being said, when ##\omega## is small, the result breaks down, as it implies ##\cos \alpha \rightarrow \infty##.

I realize that the issue is when I go from ##(3)## to ##(4)##, as I divide by ##\sin\alpha##, but that isn't allowed when ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac {g}{l}}##, as this gives ##\cos \alpha = 1 \implies \sin \alpha = 0##.

K&K explain that in doing the problem, we overlooked a second solution, namely, ##\sin \alpha = 0, T = W##. They then say:

"Physically, for ##\omega \leq \sqrt {g/l}##, the only acceptable solution is ##\alpha = 0, \cos\alpha = 1##. For ##\omega > \sqrt{g/l}##, there are two solutions: \cos \alpha = 1 \cos\alpha = \sqrt{\frac{g}{\omega^2 l}}

I'm having a difficult time understanding why this is the case. Is there no way to come up with one solution which suffices on its own?
Typo in your first equation, you meant cos, not sin.
It took me a while to deduce the rod is vertical. But that means the rotation of the rod is irrelevant, it might as well be hanging from a fixed point.
But to answer your question, yes it can be written as a single solution, by not cancelling the sin: ##\sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha)=\sin(\alpha)\sqrt{\frac g{\omega^2l}}##, but that does not alter the conclusion that there are two solutions for ##\alpha## in one range of ##\omega## and only one solution in another.
 
haruspex said:
Typo in your first equation, you meant cos, not sin.
It took me a while to deduce the rod is vertical. But that means the rotation of the rod is irrelevant, it might as well be hanging from a fixed point.
But to answer your question, yes it can be written as a single solution, by not cancelling the sin: ##\sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha)=\sin(\alpha)\sqrt{\frac g{\omega^2l}}##, but that does not alter the conclusion that there are two solutions for ##\alpha## in one range of ##\omega## and only one solution in another.

Fixed the typo, thanks! How did you deduce the rod is vertical?
 
Cosmophile said:
Fixed the typo, thanks! How did you deduce the rod is vertical?
From this:
Cosmophile said:
substitute ##r = l \sin\alpha##
Ok, it could be that the rod is horizontal and the string is attached at its axis of rotation, but either way there is no contribution to the radius from the rod length. Thus, simply hanging vertically is always a solution.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top