Knoll (knob/bump) on the plate of the capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the top and base of a hemispherical knoll on a flat charged capacitor plate using the principle of superposition. The electric field away from the knoll is denoted as E_0. At the top of the knoll, the electric field is found to be 3E_0 due to the superposition of the original field and the dipole field created by the knoll. Conversely, at the base of the knoll, the electric field is zero, as the dipole field cancels out the original field. The calculations involve modeling the knoll as a dipole and applying relevant equations to determine the resultant fields.
sergiokapone
Messages
306
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


The inner surface of one of the plates
flat charged capacitor has a small hemispherical knoll.
Away from it the electric field in the capacitor is equal to ## E_0 ##. Using the principle of superposition find the field at the top and at the base of the knoll.

Homework Equations


Field near metall surface ##E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}## (SI units)

The Attempt at a Solution


The idea is to represent plate with knoll as two different things. May be as a plate with hole with the inserted in it sphere, or as a plate with hemisphere lying thereon. Need some help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this your problem?
 
need picture.
if the knoll protrudes from the plate then the bottom is part of the metalization and the E field there = 0.
 
I found solution. Let's start with the model:
403a07446e9060338a7f7a080574c4c4.png


Dipole momentum of the sphere

\begin{equation}
p = \frac{3}{4\pi}VE_0 = r^3 E_0\label{p}.
\end{equation}

Field of the dipole in general
\begin{equation}
\vec E = \frac{3(\vec p\vec r)}{r^5}\vec r - \frac{\vec p}{r^3}. \label{dipE}
\end{equation}

Field of the dipole at the top
\begin{equation}
\vec E_\text{dip} = \frac{2\vec p}{r^3} = 2\vec E_0. \label{dipEup}
\end{equation}

Due to supperposition principle
\begin{equation}
\vec E = \vec E_0 + \vec E_\text{dip} = 3\vec E_0.
\end{equation}

Field of the dipole at the base
\begin{equation}
\vec E = - \frac{\vec p}{r^3}. \label{dipEbase} = - \vec E_0
\end{equation}

Due to supperposition principle
\begin{equation}
\vec E = \vec E_0 + \vec E_\text{dip} = 0.
\end{equation}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top