Lab question regarding cylinders

  • Thread starter Thread starter protossadv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinders Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on conducting a lab experiment to measure the rotational inertia of a hollow cylinder by rolling it down an incline. The experimenter seeks suggestions for suitable materials to create cylinders with varying inner and outer radii while maintaining uniform density. Ideas proposed include using empty tin cans, different sizes of pipes, and candles, but concerns about controlling variables and obtaining sufficient data values were raised. A suggestion to use materials like tissue or tape to gradually increase the radius was made, with a preference for thicker options to expedite the process. The conversation emphasizes the need for practical solutions to effectively alter the cylinder's dimensions for the experiment.
protossadv
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
hi
im trying to do a lab on rotational inertia of a hollow cylinder
i plan to roll a hollow cylinder down an incline
and see how the inner radius, outer radius, and mass affects the final translational velocity
but i am not sure what i can use for the cylinder
to sufficiently control and alter the variables

does anyone have any ideas?
thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Different sizes of pipe -- iron pipe, plastic pipe, and so on.
Empty "tin" cans of various sizes with the ends cut off.
Surely you can think of more...
 
Try two identical cans of mushroom soup, one at room temperature and one left in the freezer overnight.
 
An easy way to control other variables such as density might be to use a cylinder in which you can drill holes of different sizes.A broomstick and a candle come to mind.You can get candles of very large radii.
 
kuruman said:
Try two identical cans of mushroom soup, one at room temperature and one left in the freezer overnight.

Only if it's Campbells mushroom soup:biggrin:
 
Different sizes of pipe -- iron pipe, plastic pipe, and so on.
Empty "tin" cans of various sizes with the ends cut off.
Surely you can think of more...
pipes are a bad idea because i would need at least 15 data different data values and i can't really slowly increase or reduce the radius
i also need uniform density so i can't use different types of pipes

freezing a can would also just give 2 data values which would not be enough

An easy way to control other variables such as density might be to use a cylinder in which you can drill holes of different sizes.A broomstick and a candle come to mind.You can get candles of very large radii.

i think that's a great idea and its worth a try

but does anyone kno anything kind of like tissue or tape
that i can constantly wrap around to increase the radius?
it would be great if its much thicker than tissue because tissue would take forever to increase the radius

thanks in advance
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top