Ladder operators and harmonic oscillator

cleggy
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
1. Explain why any term (such as AA†A†A†)with unequal numbers of raising and lowering operators has zero expectation value in the ground state of a harmonic oscillator.

Explain why any term (such as AA†A†A) with a lowering operator on the extreme right has zero expectation value in the ground state of a harmonic oscillator.

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution

Please help as I'm totally stuck with this. Does it have to do with orthonormality of different eigenfunctions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it has, and also consider the ground state as the problem tells you to do.

what is the effect of A on |0> ? And what about it's dual? i.e. <0|A†

Now give it a try, star with your first operator AA†A†A† and tell us what you get and why
 
with AA†A†A† I get \psi_{}n+2. The first to terms convert \psi_{}n into different eigenfunctions. Because \psi_{}n is orthonormal to these eigenfunctions, these terms can be dropped from the integral.

Correct?


Also since the lowering operator is first to act on the ground-state harmonic iscillator, this takes it below the ground-state which cannot be allowed.

On the right track?
 
I have a hard tome to understand your language..

with AA†A†A† acting on the state to the right (remember that this is sandwiched between \psi^* _0 and \psi _0, the two first will give you \psi _2 so what is left is

\psi^* _0 AA^{\dagger} \psi_2

do the rest of the operation:
\psi^* _0 \psi_2
thus integral gives zero

And yes, you can't go further down with the ground state, thus A|0> = 0
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top