Lagrange Function for a certain problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter headbam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Lagrange
headbam
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is connected by a massless spring of force constant k and unstressed
length r0 to a point P that is moving along a horizontal circular path of radius a at a
uniform angular velocity ω. Verify the Lagrange-Function!

Homework Equations



Could there be a typing error in the book (the book provided the solution which can be seen in the file "function.png". My own solution just differs in the term with r and has 1/2*m*r^2*theta' instead of 1/2*m*r*theta' like shown in the book. However i think my solution is right or can anybody find a mistake?

The Attempt at a Solution



x[1](t):=a*cos(omega*t)#`this is the x-coordinate of P
y[1](t):=a*sin(omega*t)#`this is the y-coordinate of P
x[2](t):=x[1](t)+r(t)*cos(theta(t))#`this is the x-coordinate of m
y[2](t):=y[1](t)+r(t)*sin(theta(t))#`this is the y-coordinate of m
T := (1/2)*m*((diff(x[2](t), t))^2+(diff(y[2](t), t))^2)
V :=(1/2)*k*(r-r[0])^2
L=T-V

I attached a drawing of the exercise and two lagrange functions (from the book and my solution) and a Maple file for convenience.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is almost certainly correct. That term in the books answer doesn't have consistent dimensions with the terms around it.
 
Ah yeah. I should have checked the dimensions as well! Thanks for the advice!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top