Lagrangian for Coupled Ocillator problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around formulating the Lagrangian for a coupled oscillator system consisting of three equal masses connected by springs. The original poster describes the setup, including the spring constants and the displacements of the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the Lagrangian by defining the kinetic and potential energies but expresses uncertainty regarding the signs of the coefficients. Participants question the correct formulation of potential energy, particularly concerning the contributions from the inner springs.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the original poster's approach, indicating that while the kinetic energy expression is correct, the potential energy needs further refinement. There is an ongoing exploration of how to accurately account for the extensions of the inner springs based on the positions of the masses.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the equilibrium positions of the masses and the interactions between them when calculating potential energy. There is a recognition that the setup involves multiple springs, which complicates the potential energy calculations.

MikeD1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



|--------------------|
m|----------m-------- |m
|--------------------|

-------> x : positive x-axis

This is a picture of a coupled oscillator in equilibrium. All three masses are equal and the spring constant on the long springs are k and the two short middle springs is κ. the displacement of the three masses are defined as x1, x2, x3.

Homework Equations


L=T-U
T=1/2 m (xdot)^2
U= 1/2kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble with the lagrangian for this problem, mostly with the sign of the coefficients. I think that the kinetic energy T= 1/2 m((x1dot)^2+(x2dot)^2+(x3dot)^2)
and the potential U= 1/2 [kx1^2 + 2κx2^2 + kx3^2 ] .
is this the correct approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is correct. Just be careful that x1,x2,x3 are the displacements of the masses from their equilibrium positions (not from some shared origin).

Edit: Sorry, its not correct. There are 4 springs in the problem, and you've correctly identified 1/2kx1^2 + 1/2kx3^2 is the potential energy due to the outer springs. But the potential energy due to the inner springs is not κx2^2. If you think about it, the extension of the inner springs depends on the position of the other masses as well (not just the middle one). So you need to calculate the extension of the inner springs (compared to their equilibrium length) and this will tell you what the potential energy must be.
 
Last edited:
So the extension of the inner springs due to the movement of the two outer masses would be the displacement relative to the equilibrium positions of the the two masses. So would it be correct if I assume that the displacement on the inner spring is just x3-x1? where x1 and x3 are the displacement of the masses relative to the equilibrium.
 
no, remember there are two inner springs. You should calculate the potential energy due to each inner spring. To do this, think about the positions of the masses and how that affects the extension of each of the inner springs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K