Lagrangian hamiltonian mech COC Goldstein 8.27

Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) the lagrangian for a system of one degree of freedom can be written as.

L= (m/2) (dq/dt)2sin2(wt) +q(dq/dt)sin(2wt) +(qw)2

what is the hamiltonian? is it conserved?

b) introduce a new coordinate defined by

Q = qsin(wt)

find the lagrangian and hamiltonian with the new coordinate and is it conserved?



Homework Equations



qp-L = H

The Attempt at a Solution



Just wondering what the method is to solve b) or is it as simple as

q = Q/sin(wt)

(dq/dt) = (dQ/dt)/sin(wt) - Qwcos(wt)/(sin2(wt))

subbing that in and solving?

I'm assuming that this change of coordinate is supposed to make the Hamiltonian independent of time and therefore conserved.

Yet what i found is not conserved, so i assume i used the wrong method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Liquidxlax said:

Homework Statement



a) the lagrangian for a system of one degree of freedom can be written as.

L= (m/2) (dq/dt)2sin2(wt) +q(dq/dt)sin(2wt) +(qw)2

what is the hamiltonian? is it conserved?

b) introduce a new coordinate defined by

Q = qsin(wt)

find the lagrangian and hamiltonian with the new coordinate and is it conserved?

Homework Equations



qp-L = H

The Attempt at a Solution



Just wondering what the method is to solve b) or is it as simple as

q = Q/sin(wt)

(dq/dt) = (dQ/dt)/sin(wt) - Qwcos(wt)/(sin2(wt))

subbing that in and solving?

I'm assuming that this change of coordinate is supposed to make the Hamiltonian independent of time and therefore conserved.

Yet what i found is not conserved, so i assume i used the wrong method.
Looks like a reasonable and straightforward method that you've used. How did you check out that the Hamiltonian wasn't conserved? I'd derivate it with respect to time and see if that equals 0.
 
Well isn't that always how you check if its conserved? Thanks for replying didnt think anyone would reply.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top