Lagrangian invariant but Action is gauge invariant

creepypasta13
Messages
370
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I'm having some difficulty with my QFT assignment. I have to solve the following problem.

In three spacetime dimensions (two space plus one time) an antisymmetric Lorentz tensor
F^{\mu\nu} = -F^{\nu\mu} is equivalent to an axial Lorentz vector, F^{\mu\nu} = e^{\mu\nu\lambda}F_{\lambda}. Consequently, in 3D
one can have a massive photon despite unbroken gauge invariance of the electromagnetic
field A_{\mu}. Indeed, consider the following Lagrangian:

L = -(1/2)*F_{\lambda}F^{\lambda} + (m/2)*F_{\lambda}A^{\lambda} (6)

where

F_{\lambda}(x) = (1/2)*\epsilon_{\lambda\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} = \epsilon_{\lambda\mu\nu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu},

or in components, F_{0} = -B, F1 = +E^{2}, F_{2} = -E^{1}.

(a) Show that the action S = \intd^{3}x*L is gauge invariant (although the Lagrangian (6) is not invariant).
So I tried substituting A^{\lambda} -> A^{\lambda'} = A^{\lambda} + \partial^{\lambda}\Lambda
and F^{\lambda} -> F^{\lambda'} = \epsilon^{\lambda\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}'

then I obtained L' = L + (1/2)*[ F_{\lambda} \epsilon^{\lambda\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} \Lambda + some other terms]

What I don't understand is how these leftover terms would vanish after being integrated (to obtain S'), but they don't all vanish if they are not integrated (since L is not invariant). Is there some kind of special mathematical trick I have to use? I just don't see how I can integrate terms like \intd^{3}x F_{\lambda}\epsilon^{\lambda\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\Lambda
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I can see how Fλ ϵλμν∂μ ∂ν Λ would vanish. The \mu and \nu are symmetric wrt to exchange for the partial derivatives, but the indices of the \epsilon symbol are totally antisymmetric. Multiplying a symmetric tensor and an antisymmetry one gives zero always.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top