Lagrangian mechanics for two springs

wglmb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spring of negligible mass and spring constant k, hanging vertically with one end at a fixed point O, supports a mass m, and beneath it as second, identical spring carrying a second, identical mass.
Using a generalised coordinates the vertical displacements x and y of the masses from their positions with the springs unextended, write down the Lagrangian.
Find the position of equilibrium and the normal modes and frequencies of vertical oscillations.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



KE: \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})
PE: mg(l+x)+mg(2l+y)+\frac{1}{2}kx^{2}+\frac{1}{2}k(y-x)^{2} =mg(3l+x+y)+kx^{2}+\frac{1}{2}ky^{2}-kxy

Lagrangian: L=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})-mg(3l+x+y)-kx^{2}-\frac{1}{2}ky^{2}+kxy

Equations of motion:
\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}})-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=0 \Rightarrow m\ddot{x}+mg+2kx-ky=0

\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{y}})-\frac{\partial L}{\partial y}=0 \Rightarrow m\ddot{y}+mg+ky-kx=0

Know that B_{ij}\ddot{q}_{j}+A_{ij}q_{j}=0

\Rightarrow B=\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> m &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; m \end{array} \right), A=\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 2k &amp; -k \\<br /> -k &amp; k \end{array} \right)

B^{-1}A=\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{m} &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; \frac{1}{m} \end{array} \right)\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 2k &amp; -k \\<br /> -k &amp; k \end{array} \right)<br /> =\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{2k}{m} &amp; \frac{-k}{m} \\<br /> \frac{-k}{m} &amp; \frac{k}{m} \end{array} \right)

Eigenvalues turn out to be:
\lambda=\frac{k}{2m}(3+\sqrt{5}) and \lambda=\frac{k}{2m}(3-\sqrt{5})

This doesn't look very likely to be right.
Then when I work out the eigenvectors, I get (0,0) in both cases...
... where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you moved the masses down x and y respectively, the strain energies increased as you have indicated, but the gravitational energies also increase?
 
Haven't I got that included in the mg(3l+x+y) part of the PE? This comes from mg(l+x)+mg(2l+y) which is mg times the height of the first particle plus mg times the height of the second.
 
The gravitational potential energy is decreasing with increasing values of x and y, so you need some negative signs.
 
Ah, I see what you mean - of course! I don't have time just now but I'll work that through later and see how I manage :)

Edit:

Hmm, well I still get the same matrices A and B, since they come from the double-dotted terms and the x&y terms. The constant terms (now -mg for both of the equations of motion) aren't used.
I have a feeling those constant terms shouldn't even be there, since none of the examples we've been given have any...
 
Last edited:
It's OK, I've figured it out now. Thanks :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top