How can the constraint condition be used to define generalized coordinates?

intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Build the lagrangian of a set of N electric dipoles of mass m, length l and charge q.
Find the equations of motion.
Find the corresponding difference equations.

Homework Equations


Lagrange function
L=T-V

Lagrange's equations
\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x_k}}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_k}=0

The Attempt at a Solution


Electrostatic potential
V=\sum\limits^{N/2}_{i=1} \frac{kq}{r_i}-\sum\limits^N_{i=N/2+1} \frac{kq}{r_i}

Kinetic energy
T=\sum\limits^{N}_{i=1} \frac{1}{2}m\,v_i^2

Constraints
(r_j - r_i)-l^2=0

The system has N/2 degrees of freedom. (?)

how the constraint condition defines the generalized coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lagrangian of the systemL=\sum\limits^{N}_{i=1}\frac{1}{2}m\,v_i^2-\sum\limits^{N/2}_{i=1}\frac{kq}{r_i}+\sum\limits^N_{i=N/2+1}\frac{kq}{r_i}+\lambda(r_j-r_i-l^2)Lagrange's equations \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x_k}}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_k}=0\frac{d}{dt} (m\dot{x_k}) - \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_k} - \lambda \frac{\partial (r_j-r_i-l^2)}{\partial x_k} = 0 Difference equationsx_{n+1}=x_n+\Delta t \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial x_k} + \lambda \frac{\partial (r_j-r_i-l^2)}{\partial x_k} \right)
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top