Laplace transforms of heaviside step functions

danj303
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the initial value problem
y'' + 1/3y' + 4y = fk(t)

with y(0) = y'(0) = 0,

fk(t) = 1/2k for 4 - k < t < 4 + k
0 otherwise

and 0 < k < 4.



(a) Write fk(t) in terms of Heaviside step functions and then solve the initial value problem.





The Attempt at a Solution



I can convert it to a heaviside function and do the laplace transform and get

fk(t)= 1/2k H(t-(4-k)) - 1/2k H(t+(4-k))

and then taking the laplace transform of the entire equation get

Y(s) = 1/2k(s2+1/3 s + 4) * (e-(4-k)s/s - e-(4+k)s/s)

Im assuming this is corrent. But then how do I take the inverse laplace transform of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
danj303 said:
I can convert it to a heaviside function and do the laplace transform and get

fk(t)= 1/2k H(t-(4-k)) - 1/2k H(t+(4-k))

I think if you graph this out, you'll find it is not the function you want

H(t-4+k)-H(t+4-k)=\left\{\begin{array}{lr}-1 &amp;, t&lt; 4-k \\ 1 &amp;, t&gt;4-k\end{array}\right.

and then taking the laplace transform of the entire equation get

Y(s) = 1/2k(s2+1/3 s + 4) * (e-(4-k)s/s - e-(4+k)s/s)

Im assuming this is corrent. But then how do I take the inverse laplace transform of this?

Much like the other problem you posted, you'll want to use the linearity of the inverse LT:

\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[\frac{e^{-(4-k)s}-e^{-(4+k)s}}{2ks\left(s^2+\frac{1}{3}s+4\right)}\right]=\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[\frac{e^{-(4-k)s}}{2ks\left(s^2+\frac{1}{3}s+4\right)}\right]-\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[\frac{e^{-(4+k)s}}{2ks\left(s^2+\frac{1}{3}s+4\right)}\right]

For each of the two individual inverse LTs, you might want to use the method of partial fraction decomposition
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top