Laplaces equation in polar coordinates

catcherintherye
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
The function u(r,\theta)

satisfies Laplace's equation in the wedge 0 \leq r \leq a, 0 \leq \theta \leq \beta

with boundary conditions u(r,0) = u(r,\beta) =0, u_r(a,\theta)=h(\theta). Show that

u(r,\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty A_nr^{n\pi/\beta}sin(\frac{n\pi\theta}{\beta})

A_n=a^{1-\frac{n\pi}{\beta}\frac{2}{n\pi}\int_{0}^{\beta}h(\theta)sin\frac{n\pi\theta}{\beta}d\theta
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have posted here before so surely you know the basic rules!

No one is going to do your homework for you and it wouldn't help you if they did! Show us what you have tried so we can see where you went wrong or got stuck.
 
I saw the question, realized I was incapable and thought I'd put it up for some hints... I do have a similar problem viz laplace in the unit circle...


\nabla^2U=0

Boundary conditions are 1) U=0 at r=0

2) U(1,\theta)=2cos\theta

now I have quoted from the notes that the general solution is

U(r,\theta) =C_0lnr + D_0 + \sum_{0}^\infty(C_0r+\frac{D_0}{r^n}).(A_ncosn\theta + B_nsinn\theta)

now I am told that B.C 1 implies D_0 = 0=C_n for n=0,1,2,3,4...

I am immediately confused why it is necessary to have these two coeffiecient set to zero, surely we could have some situation whereby the three terms could cancel to zero without insisting their coefficients are zero??
 
Last edited:
The sines, cosines and the constant function are linearly independent on the unit circle.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top