Law of conservation of momentum problem

AI Thread Summary
A falling rock gains momentum as it accelerates, but this does not contradict the law of conservation of momentum. When considering the Earth and the rock as a system, the Earth's momentum also increases, though imperceptibly. The net force must be zero for momentum to be conserved, which is not the case when only the rock is considered. Defining the system to include both the rock and the Earth allows for momentum conservation. Therefore, momentum is conserved when the entire system is accounted for.
Ahalp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A falling rock gains momentum as its speed increases. Does this observation contradict the law of conservation of momentum. Explain.

Answer in the textbook:

This observation does not contradict the law of conservation of momentum. The momentum of the Earth increases toward the falling object. The amount of change in the earth’s velocity is so small it is imperceptible, so it appears the law of conservation is being contradicted, but it is not.


The Attempt at a Solution



My initial answer was that it doesn't contradict the law of conservation of momentum because it doesn't satisfy the conditions for the law. For momentum to be conserved, the net force on the system has to be zero. I wrote that the net force on the system is not zero as the apple is accelerating due to gravity. So, the law of conservation of momentum does not apply to it.

The textbook includes Earth in the system, but I didn't. However, if we don't include Earth in the system, would my answer make sense?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. If you define your system as the apple only, then your answer is correct. If you define your system as the apple and the Earth, then the book is correct. You can think of it in either way, which ever way is more convenient.
 
Matterwave said:
Yes. If you define your system as the apple only, then your answer is correct. If you define your system as the apple and the Earth, then the book is correct. You can think of it in either way, which ever way is more convenient.

Alright, thanks!

I just have one quick question relating to the original problem. If the system is set accordingly to include all the objects (like Earth and the apple in the original question), is momentum always conserved?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top