LC Circuit: Initial Conditions and Switch

AI Thread Summary
In an LC circuit with a voltage source, capacitor, and inductor, the governing equation is V_0 = (1/C)q(t) + Lq''(t). The initial conditions are crucial, as the voltage across a capacitor and current through an inductor cannot change instantaneously. It is incorrect to assume there is no charge or current at t=0 without considering the circuit's configuration. When a switch is included, the initial conditions must be re-evaluated, particularly if the switch is open at t=0 and closed afterward. Ultimately, analyzing the circuit as an RLC circuit helps clarify the initial conditions and their impact on the voltage across the capacitor.
AiRAVATA
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Hello guys. I have a simple question regarding an LC circuit.

Imagine a voltage source V_0, a capacitor C and an inductor L, all hooked up in series. I know that the equation governing the behvior of the system is

V_0=\frac{1}{C}q(t)+L\ddot{q}(t),

and hence

q(t)=A\cos \omega t + B\sin \omega t + CV_0.

What I'm having trouble with is the initial conditions. Is it fair to assume that in t=0 there is no charge nor current in the system?

If I put a switch in the system, how would the initial conditions change (assuming is open in t=0 and closed in t>0)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AiRAVATA said:
Hello guys. I have a simple question regarding an LC circuit.

Imagine a voltage source V_0, a capacitor C and an inductor L, all hooked up in series. I know that the equation governing the behvior of the system is

V_0=\frac{1}{C}q(t)+L\ddot{q}(t),

and hence

q(t)=A\cos \omega t + B\sin \omega t + CV_0.

What I'm having trouble with is the initial conditions. Is it fair to assume that in t=0 there is no charge nor current in the system?

If I put a switch in the system, how would the initial conditions change (assuming is open in t=0 and closed in t>0)?

Yes because the voltage across a capacitor cannot change instantaneously and then current though an inductor cannot change instantaneously.
 
So the answer is

q(t)=CV_0 (1-\cos \omega t)

no matter if I have a switch or not?
 
Well, in case you have been wondering, It's all wrong!

What I have to do is imagine a RLC ciruit, solve it with conditions i(0)=V_0/R, \, i'(0)=0, integrate in t, divide by C and then take the limit as R \rightarrow 0. Then I'll know what's the voltage passing trough the capacitor on my original LC circuit!

Yeah!
 
AiRAVATA said:
Well, in case you have been wondering, It's all wrong!

What I have to do is imagine a RLC ciruit, solve it with conditions i(0)=V_0/R, \, i'(0)=0, integrate in t, divide by C and then take the limit as R \rightarrow 0. Then I'll know what's the voltage passing trough the capacitor on my original LC circuit!

Yeah!

Well, you didn't give us that initial set of conditions.
 
I know, I know. It was exactly that what made me realize my minstake. Thanks for the input tough, you really got me thinking.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top