Length Contraction, which way is it?

Living_Dog
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I thought I understood SR's time dilation and length contraction. But after reading the section on "simultameity" in Tipler I am just as confused as before. Here is my source of confusion.

[A] Muon Decay:

S frame = frame of the earth; S' frame = frame of the muon

A muon falls to Earth at a speed of 0.998c ('c' of course is the speed of light). In its own frame it's lifetime is 2.0 μs, and the distance it travels is only 600 m.

But, in the Earth's frame, the speed measured is the same, but the length is 9000 m and the lifetime is 30 μs. This makes perfect sense to me since, L = γL' and the distance (L' < L) is contracted for the moving particle.

Rocket Ship:

A rocket ship flies past 2 points, A and B in S (the Earth's frame) and is measured to be a length, L, when the front is over the point B and the back is over the point A. Tipler's explanation is that this is the contracted length of the ship in S', namely: L = L'/γ. Therefore the ship's length in S' is L' = γL. This means that the moving ship's length is longer than that measured in the Earth's frame, or, L ' > L. And this is a direct contradiction to length contraction in [A]!

I know I the truth is that I don't understand this so I came here for an answer.

Thanks in advance!

-LD
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In its own frame it's lifetime is 2.0 μs, and the distance it travels is only 600 m.
That's not true; in its own frame, it doesn't travel! It's the Earth that traveled 600 m.
 
Hurkyl said:
That's not true; in its own frame, it doesn't travel! It's the Earth that traveled 600 m.

Doesn't the muon "measure" 600 m, but we measure 9000 m?

V = 0.998c = L'/\Deltat' = L/\Deltat

So, 0.998c = 600 m/ 2.0 \mus = 9000 m/ 30 \mus

No??

-LD
 
Living_Dog said:
Doesn't the muon "measure" 600 m, but we measure 9000 m?

V = 0.998c = L'/\Deltat' = L/\Deltat

So, 0.998c = 600 m/ 2.0 \mus = 9000 m/ 30 \mus

No??

-LD

The correct way to understand the equation is this. A *proper distance* is a distance between two points as measured in a frame in which the two points are at rest. Then the equation says that the distance between the two points as measured in any other frame is the proper distance divided by gamma.
In th emuon example, the 9000 m is the proper distance. In the other example, L is the length of the spaceship measured from Earth (in which frame the spaceship is in motion) therefore L is not the proper length. The proper length of the spaceship is the length of the spaceship measured in the frame of the spaceship (where it is at rest).
 
nrqed said:
The correct way to understand the equation is this. A *proper distance* is a distance between two points as measured in a frame in which the two points are at rest. Then the equation says that the distance between the two points as measured in any other frame is the proper distance divided by gamma.
In th emuon example, the 9000 m is the proper distance. In the other example, L is the length of the spaceship measured from Earth (in which frame the spaceship is in motion) therefore L is not the proper length. The proper length of the spaceship is the length of the spaceship measured in the frame of the spaceship (where it is at rest).

PERFECT! That was my confusion... now I have a fixed definition with which to apply to SR problems. Both proper time and proper LENGTH are the defintions which solve all such confusions! Dude, thanks a million! :)

-LD
 
Living_Dog said:
PERFECT! That was my confusion... now I have a fixed definition with which to apply to SR problems. Both proper time and proper LENGTH are the defintions which solve all such confusions! Dude, thanks a million! :)

-LD
You are welcome.

It *is* very confusing when the authors (or the teacher) does not make it crystal clear when one can divide by gamma and when one must multiply by gamma. If this is not carefully explained, it makes things extremely confusing. I am glad I could help.

Patrick
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top