Length of a string over a 2 pulley system

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
7 replies · 2K views · last reply
breid040
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
How does L change as mb gets heavier?
Relevant Equations
d=m(L/2)/(sqrt((2M)^2-(m)^2))
Hello all,
I am working on a lab report for physics, and am a bit stuck on one aspect. The basic layout of the pulley system is attached. (This is a diagram I made, so if there are any inaccuracies in this one either, I am happy to fix it.
image

So, I mostly understand the lab. My TA said, though, that L/2 changes as more weight is added onto mb.
Here is my attempt at understanding why:
Hand-drawn diagram of a two-pulley belt system with a taut string over the top of both circular pulleys and crossing beneath them. Red annotations mark half-lengths L/2 and an arc of angle θ2 on the left pulley, with the note 'this L/2 is longer by θ2/2π · 2πr or θ2 r'. Blue labels show a distance d and angle θ1 at the bottom.

Is this accurate? I just wanted to check.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
breid040 said:
Homework Statement: How does L change as mb gets heavier?
Homework Equations: d=m(L/2)/(sqrt((2M)^2-(m)^2))

Hello all,
I am working on a lab report for physics, and am a bit stuck on one aspect. The basic layout of the pulley system is attached. (This is a diagram I made, so if there are any inaccuracies in this one either, I am happy to fix it.
image

So, I mostly understand the lab. My TA said, though, that L/2 changes as more weight is added onto mb.
Here is my attempt at understanding why:
View attachment 252745
Is this accurate? I just wanted to check.

What is mb?
 
mb is the weight in the middle, the diagram shows it if you can see the diagram :smile:
 
breid040 said:
mb is the weight in the middle, the diagram shows it if you can see the diagram :smile:

Are the string endpoints fixed to the tops of the pulleys?
 
MichaelJ12 said:
Are the string endpoints fixed to the tops of the pulleys?
No, it's one long string that has 3 weights on it, and goes through both the pulleys. Would the amount of string lost on the inside by wrapping over the pulley be made up for by pulling more string over?
 
breid040 said:
No, it's one long string that has 3 weights on it, and goes through both the pulleys. Would the amount of string lost on the inside by wrapping over the pulley be made up for by pulling more string over?
Consider the point where the string touches the (rotated) pulley. How far is it from a vertical line through the pulley's centre? How far is it from a vertical line through the mass? What equation does that allow you to write?
 
If I'm interpreting you right, the point where the string touches the pulley to the center should just be the radius of the pulley? The distance to the mass would be the changed L/2? I tried drawing out a diagram.
Diagram of a pulley with radius r, a string running over it at angle theta to a block of mass m_b; length L marked above, d marked as vertical height, tension T and upward force F_T,b drawn, with red hand annotations.
I am a bit confused on where to go from here, however?
 
breid040 said:
where the string touches the pulley to the center
No, not to the centre of the pulley; the horizontal distance to the vertical through the centre.
breid040 said:
The distance to the mass would be the changed L/2?
Again, I asked for the horizontal distance to a vertical line through the mass. Express this in terms of what you are calling the "changed L/2", but please don’t call it that. Let's call it x.