Length of coaxial cable, based on signal reflection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the behavior of signals in coaxial cables, particularly regarding signal reflection and the impact of dielectric materials. The dielectric constant of the polyethylene insulator affects the signal speed, and the characteristic resistance of the RG-9/U cable is identified as 51 ohms. The reflection coefficient formula is discussed, explaining how signals reflect differently based on load impedance, with shorted ends causing signal inversion. An analogy to waves in a string is used to illustrate the physical principles behind these reflections, emphasizing conservation of energy and the formation of nodes. The conversation concludes with a deeper exploration of the mechanics behind wave behavior in coaxial cables.
xWaffle
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We measured the time between a signal source, and it's reflection coming back through our probe after going through an open-ended coaxial cable.

My teacher told us this: the cable has a polyethylene insulator between central wire and the grounding web, which has a dielectric constant of 2.3, which slows the speed of the signal in the wire. Find the length of the wire. You may need to use the web to look up cable properties.


Homework Equations


The resistor that 'cancelled' the reflected signal was 51 ohms, so I'm assuming that is the characteristic resistance of the cable. I found that RG-9/U cables have this characteristic resistance.

I have also found that in a transmission line, signal velocity is the reciprocal of the square root of the capacitance-inductance product, where inductance and capacitance are typically expressed as per-unit length.

v = 1/ sqrt(LC)

But I can't find the characteristic L or C of this wire anywhere.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure. Is this analog to waves in classical mechanics? What does the dielectric constant have to do with the speed of the signal if it's surrounding the wire that the signal has to travel through?

I'm not really sure how I am supposed to do this, and that is literally all the information provided to us. This is for a lab writeup. The delay in the reflected signal I measured as just about 300 nanoseconds.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TSny said:
Hello xWaffle.

These links might help:

http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/antennas/coax/coax_velocity_factor.php

http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~lecturedemonstrations/Composer/Pages/76.18.html

The signal travels through the space between the inner wire and and the woven copper shield. This space is filled with the dielectric material. So, the dielectric constant of the material affects the signal speed.

Thank you, I think I got what I needed from there. It just seemed like too simple of a problem.
_____________

Now, would anyone happen to be able to tell me why a signal inverts iitself when coming back down the coaxial cable if we've shorted the other end?

I know the math that explains it, I just can't wrap my head around what is physically happening with the signal.

The reflection coefficient

\Gamma = \frac{Z_{load} - Z_{0}}{Z_{load} + Z_{0}}

where Zload is the impedance of the load, and Z0 is the impedance of the cable.

When Zload = Z0, Γ is zero, and there is no reflection.

When the cable is open-ended, Zload = ∞, and you can rearrange it so that Γ = 1, in other words the signal is reflected back identically.

When the cable is shorted, Zload = 0, and you that Γ = -1, in other words the signal is reflected back inverted.

What is physically happening to the signals here? I'm trying to find an analog to waves on a string (attached to a wall at one end), but I really can't wrap my head around it.
 
Now, would anyone happen to be able to tell me why a signal inverts itself when coming back down the coaxial cable if we've shorted the other end?

Consider an organ pipe with a closed (=shorted) end. The air is not able to move at that end so there must be a node there (At a node the amplitude is zero). So you have two waves moving in the pipe, the forward wave and the reflected wave. How would these two waves need to be arranged at the end so that they interfere with each other to produce a node? For that to happen the reflected wave has to have the opposite amplitude to the forward wave, eg it's inverted.

Ultimately it comes down to conservation of energy. There is no energy loss due to resistive heating (P=IV) in either a short (V=0) or open circuit (I=0).
 
In the case of a string attached to a wall...

The amplitude must be zero so again there must be a node there. For that to occur the amplitude of the reflected wave must be opposite to the forward wave.

Actually nothing is totally rigid so the fixed end can move very slightly storing energy in the molecular bonds in the attachment point. Perhaps think of those bonds as very tiny ideal stiff springs that briefly store the energy arriving in the forward wave and then returning that energy to the string to form the reflected wave.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top