Length of coaxial cable, based on signal reflection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the behavior of signals in coaxial cables, particularly regarding signal reflection and the impact of dielectric materials. The dielectric constant of the polyethylene insulator affects the signal speed, and the characteristic resistance of the RG-9/U cable is identified as 51 ohms. The reflection coefficient formula is discussed, explaining how signals reflect differently based on load impedance, with shorted ends causing signal inversion. An analogy to waves in a string is used to illustrate the physical principles behind these reflections, emphasizing conservation of energy and the formation of nodes. The conversation concludes with a deeper exploration of the mechanics behind wave behavior in coaxial cables.
xWaffle
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We measured the time between a signal source, and it's reflection coming back through our probe after going through an open-ended coaxial cable.

My teacher told us this: the cable has a polyethylene insulator between central wire and the grounding web, which has a dielectric constant of 2.3, which slows the speed of the signal in the wire. Find the length of the wire. You may need to use the web to look up cable properties.


Homework Equations


The resistor that 'cancelled' the reflected signal was 51 ohms, so I'm assuming that is the characteristic resistance of the cable. I found that RG-9/U cables have this characteristic resistance.

I have also found that in a transmission line, signal velocity is the reciprocal of the square root of the capacitance-inductance product, where inductance and capacitance are typically expressed as per-unit length.

v = 1/ sqrt(LC)

But I can't find the characteristic L or C of this wire anywhere.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure. Is this analog to waves in classical mechanics? What does the dielectric constant have to do with the speed of the signal if it's surrounding the wire that the signal has to travel through?

I'm not really sure how I am supposed to do this, and that is literally all the information provided to us. This is for a lab writeup. The delay in the reflected signal I measured as just about 300 nanoseconds.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TSny said:
Hello xWaffle.

These links might help:

http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/antennas/coax/coax_velocity_factor.php

http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~lecturedemonstrations/Composer/Pages/76.18.html

The signal travels through the space between the inner wire and and the woven copper shield. This space is filled with the dielectric material. So, the dielectric constant of the material affects the signal speed.

Thank you, I think I got what I needed from there. It just seemed like too simple of a problem.
_____________

Now, would anyone happen to be able to tell me why a signal inverts iitself when coming back down the coaxial cable if we've shorted the other end?

I know the math that explains it, I just can't wrap my head around what is physically happening with the signal.

The reflection coefficient

\Gamma = \frac{Z_{load} - Z_{0}}{Z_{load} + Z_{0}}

where Zload is the impedance of the load, and Z0 is the impedance of the cable.

When Zload = Z0, Γ is zero, and there is no reflection.

When the cable is open-ended, Zload = ∞, and you can rearrange it so that Γ = 1, in other words the signal is reflected back identically.

When the cable is shorted, Zload = 0, and you that Γ = -1, in other words the signal is reflected back inverted.

What is physically happening to the signals here? I'm trying to find an analog to waves on a string (attached to a wall at one end), but I really can't wrap my head around it.
 
Now, would anyone happen to be able to tell me why a signal inverts itself when coming back down the coaxial cable if we've shorted the other end?

Consider an organ pipe with a closed (=shorted) end. The air is not able to move at that end so there must be a node there (At a node the amplitude is zero). So you have two waves moving in the pipe, the forward wave and the reflected wave. How would these two waves need to be arranged at the end so that they interfere with each other to produce a node? For that to happen the reflected wave has to have the opposite amplitude to the forward wave, eg it's inverted.

Ultimately it comes down to conservation of energy. There is no energy loss due to resistive heating (P=IV) in either a short (V=0) or open circuit (I=0).
 
In the case of a string attached to a wall...

The amplitude must be zero so again there must be a node there. For that to occur the amplitude of the reflected wave must be opposite to the forward wave.

Actually nothing is totally rigid so the fixed end can move very slightly storing energy in the molecular bonds in the attachment point. Perhaps think of those bonds as very tiny ideal stiff springs that briefly store the energy arriving in the forward wave and then returning that energy to the string to form the reflected wave.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top