Solve for Acceleration at Point B in a Rod on a Frictionless Surface"

  • Thread starter Thread starter saltine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the acceleration at point B of a rod on a frictionless surface when a force F is applied. It is established that the rod spins about its center of mass, leading to an angular acceleration calculated as α = 6F/mL. The acceleration at point B combines both translational and rotational effects, resulting in a net upward acceleration of aB = 2F/m. The absence of centripetal force is clarified due to the initial lack of rotation, and the movement of point B is influenced by the applied force not acting at the center of mass. Overall, the analysis reveals that point B experiences a momentary upward movement when force F is applied.
saltine
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Force F is applied to a rod resting on a frictionless surface. What is the acceleration at B?
3075595773_7ce3332ac1.jpg


Homework Equations


The length of the rod is L. Its mass is m.
Icenter = mL2/12

The Attempt at a Solution


The rod is supposed to spin about its center of mass. The acceleration at B is the same as that at A in polar coordinate center at the center of mass.

τ = (L/2) F = Icenter α => α = 6F/mL
a = (L/2) α = 3F/m eθ

where <b>eθ</b> is a unit vector in the counter-clockwise tangent direction relative to the center of rotation.

Is this correct? Where did the centripetal force go?

There is no centripetal force because there is no actual rotation at the moment (ω=0 rad/s).

- Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Since there is no friction, the "a" should be F/m shouldn't it?
 


shouldn't it be just Fnet=ma?
 


That is my question: Should it??

Do these situations give the same movement at B?
3075677529_3697cd62da.jpg


When I tried it using a pen on a table, it is obvious that point B moves up in the top diagram and it moves down in the bottom diagram. The F is not applied to the center of mass in the original question. Does that make the difference?

If it was just F = ma, wouldn't it imply that point B would be moving downward? Which contradicts the reality?
 


I know that the center mass will move in a line. There's was a MIT physics physics lecture on something very close to this. Can't seem to find where..
 


YAY! found it http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-01Physics-IFall1999/VideoLectures/detail/embed21.htm

Can you explain if you get it?

Starts at 07:37
 
Last edited by a moderator:


About the lecture:

I understand it but I don't that the problem is the lecture is similar to this one. In the example in the video at 7:38 where there is a spinning rod, the rod is spinning about point P, but the center of mass of the rod is at point C. The professor was saying that spinning the rod like this generates a force along the rod, because the centripetal forces do not balance out.

The part that is almost the same as my problem comes at 15:22, it shows that the center of mass would move parallel to force F, and the rod will spin at the same time.

The rod it self would have an acceleration of acm = F/m (moving downward). The point B of the rod would have an additional component from the rotation 3F/m which moves up. So if I add the two together, point B would have the acceleration:

aB = 3F/m - F/m = 2F/m this says that the point B would move up momentarily.

If there was an object just above point B, when the force F is applied, point B will push against that object.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top