Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Lighting Design Question (COMCHECK)

  1. Dec 10, 2008 #1

    RunSwimSurf

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I am doing a job for a retail store. They are 2000W over. I've looked over everything including allowances for merchandise. They don't want to reduce the ceiling lighting or the millwork furniture lighting. Does anybody know of any "tips" or "secrets" I can use to pass? Some hidden code secret? I am using the 2006 IECC. Thanks...

    Also, this high end retail store doesn't care what we have to do, but we just don't want to sign off on any b.s. energy calcs.

    (I meant to post this in the Electrical Engineering section. Can someone move please?)
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 10, 2008 #2

    dlgoff

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    When you say "They are 2000W over"; how so? Are you saying you don't have the circuits to provide for an extra 2kwatts?
     
  4. Dec 10, 2008 #3

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    No, COMCHECK is an energy conservation code compliance check. He means he has more lighting wattage than is allowed by code.
     
  5. Dec 11, 2008 #4

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    How about changing out some of the lights for LED lights. You can gain a lot of efficiency with LED lighting.
     
  6. Dec 11, 2008 #5

    dlgoff

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Shows what I know. Should have done a little checking. :blushing:
     
  7. Dec 11, 2008 #6

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

  8. Dec 12, 2008 #7

    RunSwimSurf

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    They don't want to change any lighting (no LEDs). Every one of their retail stores has the same scheme and they say other engineers were able to make it pass. I think they b.s.'d their calcs, because we're the only ones who have been over (and not just barely, I mean way over).
    They don't want to change any of the lighting design; they want to keep it consistent. They're pretty strict and if we don't get the calcs to pass, they'll drop us and hire someone else. I think that's why the others all passed.
    The architect called and said she talked to the building department and was told they don't even check energy compliance and for us not to worry (but still b.s. the numbers and sign them off!). I don't think its right to do that, plus it's our engineer's license that's at stake. If something happens and someone does decide to check...well, you know. On the other hand, if we refuse, then we lose the client...and we all know how the economy is at the moment.
     
  9. Dec 12, 2008 #8

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Interesting....

     
  10. Dec 12, 2008 #9

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Tough situation. I'd still recommend taking the high road though, as you say, your license and reputation are on the line. I'd probably proceed along these lines:

    -1- Get the architect's opinion in writing. If possible, they should get the city's response in writing as well.

    -2- Are all of these retail stores in the same geographic area, and subject to the same energy limits? If some of the stores are in non-regulated areas, and some in the regulated areas, that would be a reason why the store chain would not be able to standardize on the high-illumination lighting scheme.

    -3- Get a copy of the previous calculations where they passed. If the store cannot produce those, then request a copy from the previous engineering firm.

    -4- Assuming that you can get the opinion in writing from the architect and/or city, then state to the client that they do not need to pass at this time, show the calcs that show how far above the limit(s) they are, and give them good suggestions about how they can bring themselves down into compliance in the future. List LED lighting (show the calcs with the improvements over flourescent lighting), different illumination schemes (lighter colored walls and flooring, spot accent lighting, etc.), and other strategies. This makes it clear that you understand their situation now, and are able to give them some good technical options for moving forward when they need to.

    I definitely wouldn't give them any false data, but that's easy for me to say. Good luck.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Lighting Design Question (COMCHECK)
  1. RF Design Question (Replies: 5)

  2. Circuit design question (Replies: 22)

Loading...