I Ligo Heat Dissipation: How Do They Protect Mirrors?

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I am not sure I understand how the heat from the lasers get dissipated in LIGO, at the mirrors. Given the high power of the lasers, the mirrors heat up, but the setup is in vacuum, so it is difficult to get rid of that heat. How do they make sure that the mirrors don't get too much damage because of the heat? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's an interesting paper on this if you are interested. The laser cavity power is 100 kW, but the refectivity of the mirrors is very high (1.0 - 1ppm), so the power absorbed by the mirror is only 0.1W. This is dissipated by radiation to the surroundings, and the mirrors stay at about 17C.

<Moderator's note: attachment deleted>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unfortunately, that article is copyrighted and cannot be posted here.

Instead, see the link:
Thermal modelling of Advanced LIGO test masses - https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa6e60
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top