Linear acceleration of a rod fixed to a hinge at one end

AI Thread Summary
A uniform stick with a mass of 1.00 kg and length of 1.00 m is hinged at one end and released from a 60-degree angle. The discussion focuses on calculating the linear acceleration of the free end just after release, expressed as a percentage of gravity. The initial approach involves using torque and inertia equations, specifically questioning the use of the inertia equation for a rod rotating about one end. Clarifications are made regarding the correct variables for radius and length in the equations. Ultimately, the participant confirms they have resolved the confusion with the help provided.
mozartkart
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a uniform stick with a mass of 1.00 kg and length of 1.00m has a fixed hinge at one end. It is released at an angel of 60 degrees above the horizontal and it drops with normal gravity. What is the magnitude of the linear acceleration of the point at the free end just after release? express the result as a percentage of g (gravity)

The Attempt at a Solution


attempt

T=r*F*sin(60) T=Inertia*alpha =(mr2)*(a/r)=mra
mra=r*m*g*sin(60)
a=g*sin(60)

Is this a correct method to approach this question with or do I have to use the inertia equation for a rod rotating about one end which is 1/3 *m*L2 ? If that's the case then would this be right?

(1/3*m*L2)*a/r=rmgsin(60)
a=(r2*g*3*sin(60)) / L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi mozartkart! welcome to pf! :wink:
mozartkart said:
… do I have to use the inertia equation for a rod rotating about one end which is 1/3 *m*L2 ? If that's the case then would this be right?

(1/3*m*L2)*a/r=rmgsin(60) …

basically, yes :smile:

(except why is there an L and an r? :confused: and don't forget the weight is in the middle :wink:)
 
Theres a L and a r because the equation for alpha is a/r and the inertia equation is 1/3 m L2. Or am I approaching that wrong?ps thank you for helping me :)
 
mozartkart said:
Theres a L and a r because the equation for alpha is a/r and the inertia equation is 1/3 m L2.

ah, but then you need to choose either L or r, and stick to it when you write your equation!
:smile:

(also, i think you're using two different r's :wink:)
 
ok :) I figured it out. Thank you so much for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top