Linear Algebra- Kernel and images of a matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the kernel and image of a square matrix A, specifically examining the relationships between ker(A), ker(A^2), and im(A), im(A^2). Participants explore whether these sets are equal or if one is contained within the other, as well as the implications of these relationships for higher powers of the matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants consider the implications of an invertible matrix on the kernel and image, questioning the containment relationships between ker(A) and ker(A^2), as well as im(A) and im(A^2). They discuss specific cases and generalize their thoughts on higher powers of the matrix.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationships between the kernel and image of the matrix and its powers, suggesting that ker(A) is a subset of ker(A^2) and that im(A) contains im(A^2). However, there is no explicit consensus on the broader implications for higher powers, and further exploration is encouraged.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of different conditions of matrix A, particularly in cases where A is not invertible, which may affect the relationships being discussed.

KyleS4562
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a square matrix A:

a. What is the relationship between ker(A) and ker(A^2)? Are they necessarily equal? Is one of them necessarily contained in the other? More generally, What can you say about ker(A), ker(A^2), ker(A^3), ker(A^4),...?

b. What can you say about im(A), im(A^2), im(A^3), im(A^4),...?


2. The attempt at a solution

So i believe if A is invertible nxn matrix, than ker(A)={<0,0,0>} and so will ker(A^2) and so on. And the image of A if A is invertible is im(A)=R^n and so will the im(A^2) and so on, but I am not sure what it would be for other conditions of A at least that's what I think this question wants.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a. If x \in \ker(A), what can you say about A^2 x? What does that tell you about \ker(A^2)?

b. For any x, A^2x is in \operatorname{im}(A^2). If you rewrite A^2x as A(Ax)=Ay, what can you say about \operatorname{im}(A)?
 
for A: A^2 * x would equal the zero vector which means the ker(A^2) contains x but is not necessarily equal because it may contain another vector

B. Is that saying the im(A) contains the im(A^2) but is not necessarily equal to the im(A^2) because it will span more vectors?
 
KyleS4562 said:
for A: A^2 * x would equal the zero vector which means the ker(A^2) contains x but is not necessarily equal because it may contain another vector

In other words, we have \ker(A)\subset \ker(A^2).

KyleS4562 said:
B. Is that saying the im(A) contains the im(A^2) but is not necessarily equal to the im(A^2) because it will span more vectors?

Yes. You could also write : \operatorname{im}(A^2)\subset \operatorname{im}(A)

Now, how can you apply this to \ker(A^3), \ker(A^4)... and \operatorname{im}(A^3), \operatorname{im}(A^4)...?
 
alright, thank you very much for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K