Liquid condensing out in thermodynamics

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
We have the following expression for the temperature of the latent heat of vaporisation:

d(L/T)/dT = (Cpv - Cpl)/T + [d(Vv - Vl)/dT] *dP/dT

Where Cpv is the heat capacity at constant pressure of the vapour and the liquid respectively, Vv and Vl are the volumes of the vapour and liquid respectively, and the d(Vv - Vl)/dT is a partial derivative at constant P.

We need to show that "when the saturated vapour of an incompressible liquid is expanded adiabatically, some liquid condenses out if Cpl + Td(L/T)/dT < 0"

I'm not sure about the meaning of "saturated vapour". Does this mean it is in equilibrium with the liquid (i.e we are on the phase boundary in the P-T plane), or does it mean supersaturated (i.e there is no liquid present)?
Also, what significance does "incompressible liquid" have?
thanks very much for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
saturated vapor means the quality is equal to exactly 1. So yes, you are correct, it is on the edge of the P-T diagram where it is all vapor, but any slight change and it will go back down to saturated (i.e. some liquid and vapor) or go up into superheated.


Incompressible means Cp=Cv.
 
i'm still a little unsure as to how the piece of info Cp=Cv relates to this question. It's doesn't seem to be necessary to solve the problem.
 
Perhaps you do not need it, I was just answering your question as to what is the significance of incompressible liquid. Also, the density of the liquid remains a constant. The density will not change with pressure, it will be highly dependent on temperature.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top