Lorentz boost, electric field along x-axis, maths confusion?

JesseC
Messages
247
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Given that (φ/c,A) is a 4-vector, show that the electric field component Ex for a
Lorentz boost along the x-axis transforms according to Ex' = Ex.

Homework Equations



E_x = -\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial A_x}{\partial t}

A_x being the x component of the vector potential

The Attempt at a Solution



So I don't have a problem getting φ'/c or Ax'

Obviously:
E_x^{\prime} = -\frac{\partial \phi^{\prime}}{\partial x^{\prime}} - \frac{\partial A_x^{\prime}}{\partial t^{\prime}}

But I don't understand how to get the partial derivative w.r.t. x' in terms of x and t. Likewise for the partial derivative w.r.t. t'.

In the solutions it seems:

\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\prime}} = - \frac{\gamma \beta}{c}\frac{\partial}{\partial t} - \gamma \frac{\partial}{\partial x}

?? Does it come from the lorentz co-ord transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi JesseC! :smile:
JesseC said:
But I don't understand how to get the partial derivative w.r.t. x' in terms of x and t. Likewise for the partial derivative w.r.t. t'.

Chain rule: ∂/∂x' = ∂x/∂x' ∂/∂x + ∂t/∂x' ∂/∂t :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top