Lorentz Transformations In 2 Dimensions

KTurner
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a two-dimensional function

φ = φ(x,t)

that satisfies the relativistic wave equation given by:

[PLAIN]https://adgiiq.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pe5tdBVr0r62krIiWV_PQ42r1jrzQpWKz24xRgNe138phEqCNyZJKFXhBXqqL4YCvYeAsgVQtJJwovzjL0mKiNXyd6p1zHvkx/equation.jpg?psid=1

This equation is said to be covariant with respect to the special Lorentz transformations if exactly this equation patter arises when the variables are switched to the prime ones using the Lorentz relations

[PLAIN]https://adgiiq.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pjvmy8z5s3LeVZau_6rBjOb_5-IE1-rvRj8aRCDgeZbg8XH8Dbs65KFJqJIg0XZz7sbHLq1aWr4wP9Pfdwai3ip-bnRQaooBQ/definitions.jpg?psid=1

v = constant speed, c = speed of light (also constant), and x, t are coordinates in one frame while x', t' are coordinates in another frame. Demonstrate the Lorentz covariance explicity

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




We've been working on this for HOURS and have no idea where to start even.

Thanks so much for all the help.

Katie.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your images aren't showing up. It would be better anyway if you just typeset it in the post using the LaTeX feature of this forum.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top