Lower and Upper Riemann sums of sin(x)

paulca
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Task in real analysis:
P is a uniform partition on [0, π] and is divided into 6 equal subintervals. Show that the lower and upper riemann sums of sin (x) over P is lesser than 1.5 and larger than 2.4 respectively.

My attempt at the solution:
The greates value and the least value of sin x over an subinterval (xi- xi-1) is 1 and -1. The upper and lower riemann sums is then:
upper sum: S(P) = ∑i=16 (xi- xi-1) = x6 - x0 = π
Lower sum: s(P) = - i=16 (xi- xi-1) = -π


From this one could say that S(P) > 2.4 and s(P) < 1.5, but i don't feel like this is a full answer to the problem and i don't see another approach to solving the problem, so if anyone could give me some clue or tips it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are not the correct values for the upper and lower sums.

Let M_i = \sup\{ f(x) : x_{i-1} \leq x \leq x_i\} and m_i = \inf \{ f(x) : x_{i-1} \leq x \leq x_i \}. Then <br /> S(P) = \sum_{i=1}^6 M_i(x_i - x_{i-1}), \\<br /> s(P) = \sum_{i=1}^6 m_i(x_i - x_{i-1}).<br /> What are the maximum and minimum values of \sin x when \frac{(i-1)\pi}6 = x_{i-1} \leq x \leq \frac{i\pi}6 = x_i? They aren't all 1 and -1 respectively (aside from anything else, \sin(x) \geq 0 for x \in [0, \pi]).
 
Thank you for replying. I saw that myself a while ago and found what the maximum and minimum value of sin x over each of the 6 subintervals such that the upper sum sin x over partition P should be:
S(P) = ∑i=16 Δx ⋅max(sinx)i = (π/6) ⋅(1/2 + √3/2 + 1 + 1 + √3/2 + 1/2) = (π/6) ⋅ (3 + √3) ≈ 2,47 > 2,4
and similar for the lower sum:
s(P) = (π/6) ⋅ (1 + √3) ≈ 1,43 < 1,5
 
  • Like
Likes hitemup
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top