Calculating Luminosity Distances: Converting Angular Distances to Parsecs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Radiohannah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Luminosity
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the distance "r" in parsecs using the equation r = D_L / (1+z)² θ, "D_L" must be in parsecs, and θ should be in radians. The luminosity distance "D_L" can be derived using the provided formula, ensuring that the speed of light "c" is in km/s and the Hubble constant "H" is converted to km/s per Mpc. It's important to clarify that "r" refers to the distance between galaxies, not the distance to them. For standard calculations, using Mpc for "r" is also common, which requires "D" in Mpc.
Radiohannah
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hey

I'm getting very muddled with my units, and would really appreciate some clarity :-)

I have angular distances between galaxies at some redshift, in arcseconds

I want to calculate the distance in parsecs, taking into account the luminosity distance.


In the equation;

r = \frac{D_{L}}{(1+z)^{2}} \theta

I'm assuming that "r" in this will be my distance in parsecs.
"D_{L}" will be the luminosity distance.
and...\theta will be the angular distance (in arcseconds..?) between the galaxies.

What units would my luminosity distance have to be in, in order to calculate my "r" in parsecs?

I know that the equation for the luminosity distance is

D_{L} =(1+z)\frac{2c}{H_{0} } \frac{\Omega_{z + (\Omega - 2)[\sqrt{1+\Omega_{z}}-1]}}{\Omega^{2}(1+z)}

Does this give the correct units for "r" to be in parsecs? I am getting so confused!

Thank you
 
Space news on Phys.org
To get r in parsecs, you need D in parsecs, and theta must be in radians (which is effectively unitless). I believe the r we are talking about is distance between the galaxies, not distance to the galaxies (which is already accommodated by D). To get D in parsecs, you need to use c in km/s, and H in km/s per Mpc, and then you have to convert H to km/s per pc, and your formula should show you that D ends up in parsecs. More likely, you want want r in Mpc, so then you just need D in Mpc, c in km/s, and H in km/s per Mpc-- those are standard units.
 
That is very clear and helpful, Thank you!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top