Magnetic field behind “invisible barrier”

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of magnetic fields in a thought experiment involving a steady current and a material with specific permittivity and permeability. It is established that inside a material with different permeability, a magnetic field is generated due to the change in permeability, while if the material matches free space parameters, the field inside is expected to be zero, resembling an "invisible barrier." However, it is argued that even with matching parameters, the magnetic field outside must influence the material, and the field inside can still be non-zero if the permeability differs from one. Numerical simulations support that the magnetic field is non-zero when relative permeability is different from one, aligning with boundary conditions. The discussion concludes that the presence of a magnetic field depends on the sources present in the universe, with perfect diamagnets exhibiting unique properties.
Tilde90
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Let us consider the following thought experiment.
There is a magnetic field in free space produced by a steady current, hence solution of the (magnetostatic) Ampere's law Curl H = J.
There is also a material with some parameters ε and μ and no currents, where the Ampere's law is Curl H = 0.

Considering the usual interface conditions on the boundary between the auxiliary material and the free space, inside the material I expect to see a magnetic field generated by the change in permeability μ.
On the other hand, if the material had the same parameters of the free space, ε0 and μ0, I expect to see no field inside: it is as if there were an invisible barrier which shields a region of the free space from the outside.

Is my reasoning correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Tilde90 said:
On the other hand, if the material had the same parameters of the free space, ε0 and μ0, I expect to see no field inside
You should expect a field in it - the same field the vacuum there would have without the material. That is given by the continuum conditions but it is also very intuitive I think.
 
Thanks for your answer, mfb.

Are you sure about what you say? The fact is that the right-hand side of the Ampere's law is different between the free space and the auxiliary material, and it is equal to zero in the latter. So the only source of the magnetic field in the material would be the magnetization induced by the change in permeability, which does not exist in this thought experiment.

Running some numerical simulations you see that the field in the material is nonzero when the relative permeability is different from 1, and becomes 0 otherwise (with the field outside also going to zero on the surface to match the boundary conditions).
 
The curl of the magnetic field is zero in your material. The magnetic field itself does not have to be zero.
That is exactly what you get in vacuum as well.

If you don't have any source of magnetic fields in the whole universe, there won't be a field in your material, but you were asking about a "barrier", so I assume there is a field somewhere.

A perfect diamagnet will keep all magnetic fields outside its material, but a perfect diamagnet (##\mu_v=0##) has properties different from a vacuum.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top