Magnetic Field Flux Through a Circular Loop Near an Infinite Wire

Mandeep Deka
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
1. A circular loop, (of radius 'a') is placed with its center at a distance 'r' from an infinitely long current carrying wire, (carrying current 'I'), in the same plane as that of the wire. For, a<r, find the flux of magnetic field through the loop.



2. Differential Flux=B.dA, whose integral over a surface gives the net flux through the surface. B (at a distance x, for a infinitely straight wire carrying current I)= (mu naught. i)/2.pi.x.



3. Since the magnetic field,(B) due to a infinite st. wire is a function of perpendicular distance (x) from the wire, we consider an elementary rectangular segment of plane , enclosed by the loop at a distance (r+x) from the wire with length l=2[(a^2-x^2)^0.5] and breadth dx (differential increment in perpendicular distance from the wire). So now if we have the elementary flux as (B.l.dx), we can integrate x, in the expression from -a to +a, to obtain the flux. But the integration is a bit complicated, (though the answer be determined) which puts me into a little doubt whether my approach to solve the problem is correct! I would like u to solve the problem and check whether my process is correct or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is correct and, yes, it leads to a complicated integral. If it makes you feel any better, this problem (in my opinion) does not teach you any new physics beyond what the simpler case of the rectangular loop parallel to the wire teaches.
 
ya m aware of that.. i jus wanted to know if i was havng the corrrct approach...
by d way thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top