Magnetic field from four parallel wires

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field generated by four parallel wires carrying currents in different directions. The user seeks guidance on applying Biot-Savart's law to derive an expression for the magnetic field gradient, particularly considering small displacements from the center. A suggestion is made to superimpose the magnetic fields from each wire, acknowledging that the currents' directions will require careful addition and subtraction of the individual fields. The user is encouraged to express the final result in terms of the x and y components of the magnetic fields from the four wires. This approach aims to simplify the calculation and achieve the desired expression for the magnetic field gradient.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I am looking at four parallel wires of finite length L, whose currents run in the directions shown in the attached figure. There is no gradient along the wire-axis, so from Maxwell's equation
<br /> \frac{dB_x}{dx} = -\frac{dB_y}{dy} \equiv \tilde B.<br />
In order to find an expression for the gradient \tilde B given some current I, I need to use Biot-Savarts law. I think I need to make a binomial expansion for small displacements from the center, but I am not quite sure how to do this with the Biot-Savart law. I would really appreciate a hint.


Niles.
 

Attachments

  • arrangement.jpg
    arrangement.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 616
Physics news on Phys.org
Or you could simply superimpose 4 fields from the individual wires. I would imagine you've already solved the field for a single wire, so B=B1+B2+B3+B4. Remember, the wires aren't all in the same direction, so you have to add some and subtract others.

Once you've resolved all your issues https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=645327, you should be able to write everything in terms of the x and y components of the 4 wires.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top