Magnetic field lines through copper

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about using copper instead of glass in a homemade Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), participants addressed the impact of material on electron beam deflection. It was noted that both copper and glass do not significantly influence magnetic fields, suggesting that the beam's displacement would remain linear regardless of the tube material. The use of external scanning coils was highlighted as a potential improvement for beam control, despite concerns about the accuracy of the deflection relative to the field produced. The consensus indicated that if the target is uncharged, deflection should not be affected by the material used. Overall, the discussion emphasized that material choice may not significantly alter the magnetic field configuration in this context.
Ravaner
Messages
134
Reaction score
3
Hello. Assume an electron gun, as in CRT, made of plumbing copper instead of glass. Using magnetic scanning coils to move electron beam. Will the displacements of this beam be linear as if tube material was made of glass ? PS : this is not an exercise by though but a real problem I encounter in a system I've developped.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the target is uncharged, I don't see any reason to expect a deflection, independent of the target material.
If your question does not refer to the screen, I don't see what you want to replace.
 
Thanks for reply. To give more details my rig is an homemade Scanning Electron Microscope. Previously I used scanning coils inside vacuum, but for room problem coils are small and produce low induction field. With outside coils bigger than internal ones) it works better but I'm not sure that deflection of electron beam is the exact image of the field produced by external coils (saw tooth).
 
I don't think I understand that description without a sketch.
Copper and glass do not influence magnetic fields significantly. If you don't care about nanometers, I would not expect any changes in the magnetic field configuration.
 
That is exactly the answer I was expecting for. Many thanks to you.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top