Magnetic flow and mechanical advantage question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mechanics of tattoo machines, specifically the role of magnetic flow and mechanical advantage in their operation. The tattoo machine operates using electromagnets that attract an armature bar when activated, closing the hinge. The direction of magnetic flow is crucial; opposite magnetic poles attract while like poles repel. For optimal performance, the correct orientation of the magnetic poles is necessary to achieve the strongest pull on the armature bar. Understanding these principles can help improve the efficiency of tattoo machines.
mapache
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi - I'm a layman with a problem I'd really appreciate some help with. I've been studying tattoo machines and have a question on magnetic flow and mechanical advantage.
For background a tattoo machine is a essentially an electric horseshoe magnet with a bridge across the poles (doorbell switch): two electromagnets vertically mounted on a steel bar (the yoke). At the other end of the magnets there is a bar on a hinge (armature bar) - the fulcrum point is located below the bottom electromagnet. In the neutral state the armature bar is rotated away from the top electromagnet, so that when the electromagnets are activated it pulls the armature bar closed (it lays flat across the tops of the electromagnets). I hope this is clear with the diagram.

So my question is this: Does the direction of magnetic flow make a difference on the force closing the hinge? If so, what would be the correct orientation of magnetic poles for the strongest pull on the armature bar (does the diagram show the correct orientation of poles if it does matter)?

I'm trying to understand this better, but I'm not well versed in physics, etc.
Thanks,
Tom
 

Attachments

  • magnet-diagram.jpg
    magnet-diagram.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 604
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, the direction matters. But it is very simple, opposite poles (N-S) attract, and like poles (N-N or S-S) repel.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top