Magnetic Flux through 1 loop due to current on the other

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic flux through one loop due to the current in another loop. The scenario involves two loops with the same radius and current, positioned along the same axis, with one loop's current flowing counterclockwise and the other's clockwise.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of magnetic flux and question the phrasing of the problem regarding flux "on" versus "through." There are discussions on how to calculate the magnetic field generated by one loop and its effect on the other loop, including integration over the area of the second loop.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the need to focus on the magnetic field created by the first loop and its integration over the second loop's area. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem, with suggestions that special functions may be required for a complete solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the setup of the problem and the assumptions being made, particularly about the uniformity of the magnetic field and the implications of the distance between the loops.

lion_
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The scenario is the following, I am given 2 loops with the same radius, r, a distance of d, and same current of I. In the left loop the current goes counter clockwise, in the right loop the current is clockwise. The two loops centers lie on the same axis which are perpendicular to the plane of the loops. I am asked to find the magnetic flux of the left loop due to the current on the right loop.

I know that the magnetic flux of a loop is $$\phi=B\pi r^2$$ where $$B=\dfrac{\mu_0 I}{2R}$$ So how exactly do I find the Total magnetic flux on the loop due to the magnetic flux on the other? Since the current is opposite I will be subtracting the 2 fluxes.

So $$\phi_{self}=\phi_L-\phi_R$$ which is $$ \dfrac{\mu_0I}{2r} \pi d^2 - \dfrac{\mu_0I}{2r}\pi d^2=0$$ I don't think this makes much sense to me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, it does not make sense to ask for the magnetic flux ON something. You can have magnetic flux THROUGH something, but not ON it. Make sure you're not supposed to be calculating the magnetic force on the loop.

Second, since you only care about the flux through the second loop due to the current in the first, you do not need to worry about the magnetic field generated by the second loop. It is out of the scope of the question. However, you will need to know the magnetic field at all points within the second loop caused by the first. As such, you need to:

1. Find the function for the magnetic field caused by the first loop at all points in space.
2. Integrate this over the area of the second loop.

This will give you the total flux through the second loop, caused by the current in the first loop.
 
$$B=\dfrac{\mu_0}{2\pi} \cdot \dfrac{\mu}{l^3}$$

Is this the function you are talking about? Just substiute the numbers and that is it?
 
I agree that this seems like a magnetic force type of question.

The magnetic dipole ##\vec{\mu}## of the right loop indicates a net flux ##\Phi_B## through the left loop. You know the flux through the loop is given by:

##\Phi_B = \int \vec B \cdot d \vec A##

Where it's safe to assume the field is uniform if the distance ##d## is small. Otherwise that function you posted should help.
 
Last edited:
No more posts for nearly 2 days? Then I wll hazard the opinion that this is an extremely difficult problem, requiring special functions like Bessel functions and elliptical integrals.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K