Magnetism in infinite conducting slab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the magnetic field B in an infinite conducting slab with a uniform current density J. Ampere's Law is suggested as a suitable method for calculating the magnetic field, particularly by using a square loop for integration. The second part involves analyzing the net force and torque on a square loop placed above the slab, which depends on the angle q of the loop's normal vector. Additionally, the impact of gradually reducing the current density in the slab on charge flow through the loop wire is explored, with an emphasis on resistance. The conversation highlights the complexity of these calculations when dealing with a continuous slab rather than discrete wires.
daveed
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
"a conducting slab has infinite extent in the x and y directions and thickness L in the z direction. The slab is centered at z=0 and carries a uniform current density J=Ji where i, j, and k are unit vectors in the x, y, and z directiosn."
-Find the magnetic field B at all points.

-A square loop of side a is placed distance b above the slab. The loop has unit normal vector n=sin(q)i+cos(q)j and applied current J. what is the net force and net torque to the loop as a function of q?

-the applied current I is now removed from the loop and the current density in the slab J=Ji is reduced to zero over time T. The wire used to construct the loop has resistance/unit S. How much charge flows through each cross section of the loop wire due to the reduction in current density.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far?

It seems to me ampere's law would work well in determining the magnetic field; use a square loop such that you know exactly how much current passing through it and the only field is at the top and bottom. Integrating a line of wires across the surface and then again through the depth is another option, but sounds horrible to me.

Once you have the magnetic field, the second part should come together easily enough.
 
i really don't know how to go about doing this when its not a single wire... sorry =(
 
Have you considered the integral form of Ampere's Law?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top