Magnitude and acceleration [SOLVED] Magnitude and acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnitude and angle of an asteroid's acceleration due to forces exerted by astronauts. The net force was calculated to be 100.79 N, leading to an acceleration of 0.77 m/s² when divided by the asteroid's mass of 130 kg. The angle of acceleration was determined to be approximately -10.22 degrees, which can also be expressed as 350 degrees counterclockwise from the positive x-axis. Participants confirmed that the acceleration direction aligns with the net force direction. The final values for acceleration are 0.77 m/s² at an angle of 350 degrees.
TS656577
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Magnitude and acceleration

Homework Statement


Three astronauts, propelled by jet backpacks, push and guide a 130 kg asteroid toward a processing dock, exerting the forces shown in the figure, with F1 = 32 N, F2 = 52 N, F3 = 39 N, θ1 = 30°, and θ3 = 60°. What is the (a) magnitude and (b) angle (measured relative to the positive direction of the x axis) of the asteroid's acceleration?


Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution



If i had to make a guess...would i add the forces up which would be...129=ma where m is 130kg? Or would the magnitude be each mass squared and the square root of those sums which would be 72.45 in this case?
 

Attachments

  • q7.jpg
    q7.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 700
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so i believe i figured out the x component of the net forces which i got to be 99.21 and -y component was -17.77. To get the magnitude for part a, I take 99.21^2 and -17.77^2. Add them together and take the square root which i got to be 100.79. However, i put that answer into the program and its wrong. Any ideas? I also got the x component for the acceleration which is .76 and the y is -.137. Then i take y/x and the inverse tan of that answer?
 
TS656577 said:
Ok, so i believe i figured out the x component of the net forces which i got to be 99.21 and -y component was -17.77. To get the magnitude for part a, I take 99.21^2 and -17.77^2. Add them together and take the square root which i got to be 100.79. However, i put that answer into the program and its wrong. Any ideas? I also got the x component for the acceleration which is .76 and the y is -.137. Then i take y/x and the inverse tan of that answer?
That looks better, but the magnitude of the net force is 100.79...that's not the magnitude of the acceleration. Your acceleration components look good (don't forget the units and round offs), angle theta looks good , ( is it clockwise or counterclockwise from x axis)...so now what do you get for the magnitude and direction of the acceleration?
 
for the magnitude...im guessing youd take each term squared and take teh square root of that sum. Like for before with the magnitude. I am not entirely sure how the 100.79 comes into play then...
 
For part A i got .77 m/s^2 and part b, i got -10.22 degrees but not sure of what to put in. Would i subtract that from 360?
 
TS656577 said:
For part A i got .77 m/s^2 and part b, i got -10.22 degrees but not sure of what to put in. Would i subtract that from 360?
Looks good, the .77m/s^2 acceleration acts about 10 degrees clockwise from the positive x axis, or 350 degrees counterclockwise from the positive x axis. I'd say use .77 at 350, although .77 at -10 would also be correrct. Note that you calculated the net force to be 100.79, so using F_net=ma, you'd get a =100.79/130 = .77, same result, and the angle at which it acts would also be (must be) the same as the acceleation angle (acceleration is always in the direction of the net force).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top