Magnitude of electric charge on a glass rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between electric charge and gravitational forces, using a hollow metal sphere and tinfoil as examples. The tutor seeks to understand how much charge can be generated by rubbing a glass rod with fur and whether this charge would make the rod too heavy to hold. It is noted that a charged glass rod can lift small objects, but estimating the charge based on this lifting ability is complicated due to unknown variables. The conversation also touches on the concept of using capacitors to isolate charge and the challenges in relating electric force to gravitational weight. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the complexity of quantifying electric charge in practical scenarios.
barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51

Homework Statement


I am a physics tutor. I want to show the relationship between electric charges and forces and gravitational forces. I am relating an example as follows.

If we have a hollow metal sphere the size of the Earth with a charge of 1.63E15 C and a piece of tinfoil the surface with a charge of only 2.72E-9 C , the tinfoil would weigh the same as a 250 pound (986 N) person. So I am wondering..

How much charge can you get if you rubbed a glass rod with fur, i.e. how many coulombs. If I rubbed the glass rod with fur, would it be to heavy to hold?

Just wondering.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A glass rod charged by rubbing with fur is capable of lifting small bits of paper against gravity over a few centimeters of distance. So you might be able to estimate the charge from the force it can produce.

Can you think of anything that might limit the amount of charge that can be deposited on or removed from the surface of the rod?

By the way, 250 lbs is about 113 kg, weighing about 1112 N at the Earth's surface.
 
Estimating charge by lifting paper might be hard since you don't know the induced charge on the paper. I am now thinking that if I conceptually made a capacitor from two 0.1 X 0.1m plates 1 mm apart and charged the plates with 30 volts I would have the correct charge on the plates. Then I could cut the wire on one of them to isolate the charge. Now a plate would have 2.72E-9 C of charge and weigh about 946 N = 211 pounds.

Anyway, just trying to relate electrical force to gravitational force.
 
I'm not sure where you're getting this "weight" from. If it's an electric force, you'd need a heck of a big charge nearby to attract (or repel) a plate by that amount with that tiny charge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top